Internet website accessibility.
Summary
The Unruh Civil Rights Act requires persons within the jurisdiction of the state to be free and equal and, regardless of the person's sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status, to be entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments, as prescribed, and makes a violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) a violation of the act. Existing law imposes liability upon a person who denies, aids, or incites a denial of, or makes any discrimination or distinction contrary to, rights afforded by law for actual damages suffered, exemplary damages, a civil penalty, and attorney's fees, as specified, to any person who was denied the specified rights. Existing law also imposes liability upon a person, firm, or corporation that denies or interferes with admittance to, or enjoyment of, public facilities or otherwise interferes with the rights of an individual with a disability, as specified, for damages and attorney's fees to a person who was denied those rights. This bill would grant to an entity an affirmative defense to a claim seeking statutory damages under the provisions described above on the basis of a specific accessibility barrier on the entity's internet website, as defined, if the entity provided evidence to the plaintiff demonstrating within 30 days of receiving a written prelawsuit demand from the plaintiff that either (1) the entity published a digital accessibility report on the accessibility page of its internet website disclosing the specific access barrier and updated that report to reflect remediation of the access barrier or (2) that various things were true regarding the entity's efforts to identify and remediate access barriers on its internet website, including the entity had a reasonable and good faith basis to believe that the internet website was accessible and conformed with the internet website accessibility standard, as specified. This bill would also prohibit a resource service provider from, in exchange for money or any other form of remuneration, negligently, recklessly, or knowingly constructing, licensing, distributing, or maintaining for online use a resource or part of an internet website that causes an entity's internet website to be inaccessible or not conformant with the internet website accessibility standard if the resource or part of the internet website is within the control of the resource service provider to remediate or from making a false representation that a resource or part of an internet website is accessible or conforms to the internet website accessibility standard. The bill would authorize a small business entity, as defined, and certain public attorneys, including the Attorney General, to bring a civil action to enforce that provision, as specified.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action May 21, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/23/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB2190
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill text is substantively unchanged between these two versions. The diff reflects a transition from the formal legislative document format (with page numbers, line numbers, and column layout) to a web-based presentation of the same enacted bill text on the California legislature website. No policy language, thresholds, dates, or requirements were modified.
TECHNICAL
Presentation format changed from a paginated legislative document with line numbers and column layout to a web-based HTML rendering of the same bill text, including added website navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.) and a 'Digest Key' summary section.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
4
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 13, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 13, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 7).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Greg Wallis
RRepublican
Co
Aisha Wahab
DDemocratic
Co
John Harabedian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2190
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2190. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline