AB 2129 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

State employees: compensation: firefighters.

Summary
Existing law provides that in order for the state to recruit skilled firefighters for the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, it is the policy of the state to consider prevailing salaries and benefits prior to making salary recommendations. Existing law requires the Department of Human Resources, in order to provide comparability in pay, to take into consideration the salary and benefits of other jurisdictions employing 75 or more full-time firefighters who work in California. This bill would require the state to bargain in good faith with firefighters who are rank-and-file members of State Bargaining Unit 8, employed by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, to reach a competitive range within 15% of the average salary for corresponding ranks in 20 California fire departments agreed to by the exclusive bargaining representative for Bargaining Unit 8 and the Department of Human Resources. The bill would require the state and the exclusive representative for State Bargaining Unit 8 to jointly survey the estimated average salaries for those 20 fire departments and report the findings, as provided. The bill would provide that nothing in the bill creates an entitlement to an automatic salary increase. The bill would require any salary increase for firefighters under these provisions to be implemented through a memorandum of understanding, in accordance with specified procedures governing collective bargaining agreements. The bill would include legislative findings and declarations related to its provisions.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2026 Last action Aug 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/18/26 - Introduced 08/21/26 - Amended Senate · 5 edits · Aug 21, 2026
MODERATE
The Senate amendment to AB 2129 adds two significant protective provisions: an explicit statement that nothing in the bill creates an entitlement to an automatic salary increase, and a requirement that any salary adjustment be implemented only upon mutual agreement between the state and the exclusive bargaining representative. The survey methodology was also modified to remove the specific July 1 projection standard and instead reference reporting under an existing statutory provision (Section 19826(c)).
Scope change
The bill's scope is narrowed from what could be read as creating a benchmark-based pay obligation to a framework that explicitly requires mutual agreement for any salary change and disclaims automatic entitlements. The core purpose (bargaining in good faith toward a competitive range within 15% of comparable departments) remains unchanged, but the mechanism is made more contingent on bilateral negotiation.
REQUIREMENT

New subdivision (d) states: 'Nothing in this section creates an entitlement to an automatic salary increase.' This explicitly disclaims any mandate for automatic pay raises, making clear the bill is a bargaining framework rather than a pay guarantee.

New subdivision (b)(2) requires that any salary adjustment contemplated by the section be implemented only upon agreement between the state and the exclusive representative through a memorandum of understanding. This makes mutual consent an explicit precondition for any pay change.

TECHNICAL

Subdivision (b)(1) survey methodology was changed from calculating salaries 'based on the projected average total salary for those departments as of July 1 of the year in which the survey is conducted' to simply 'jointly survey the estimated average salaries' with findings reported 'in accordance with subdivision (c) of Section 19826.' This removes the specific projection date and ties reporting to an existing statutory framework.

The policy statement in subdivision (c) was modified to add the phrase 'agreed to as provided in subdivision (a)' after referencing comparable jurisdictions, reinforcing that the list of 20 departments is subject to the agreement process described in subdivision (a).

SCOPE

The legislative digest was updated to include the language 'nothing in the bill creates an entitlement to an automatic salary increase' and 'departments and report the findings, as provided,' reflecting the new substantive provisions.

Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2026 · Assembly May 28, 2026

How they voted

400
Passed
Total votes 40
Aug 25, 2026
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Aug 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 1.).
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 1. Page 5526.)
lower
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 6, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. E. & R.
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Heath Flora
Heath Flora
RRepublican
CA
9