Human trafficking: notice and training: disaster sites.
What changed between versions
New subdivision (b) exempts telecommunications companies and internet service providers (including telephone corporations, wireless carriers, cable operators, broadband providers, and other entities primarily engaged in providing telecommunications or internet access services) from the notice-posting requirement for disaster sites and mitigation sites, unless they also operate a facility listed in paragraphs (1) through (15).
The training requirement for disaster site entities was narrowed from 'an entity that operates in an area described in paragraph (16) or (17)' to 'a privately operated entity that operates in an area described in paragraph (16) or (17),' making the private-operation limitation explicit in the training provision as well.
New alternative posting provision for disaster site and mitigation site entities: if the notice cannot be posted near a public entrance as normally required, the employer must post it conspicuously at the place of work where employees can see it coming or going, or at the office or nearest agency for payment kept by the employer.
Five specific examples of trafficking scenarios at disaster sites were removed from the training requirements: (1) a subcontractor threatening undocumented workers with deportation, (2) withheld pay to compel labor, (3) recruitment through false promises for a remote dangerous job, (4) workers moved across locations without proper documentation, and (5) workers forced to work in unsafe conditions or housed in substandard accommodations. The general requirement to include 'examples and case scenarios relevant to how trafficking occurs at designated disaster sites' remains.
Legislative intent language was changed from 'rescue of human trafficking victims' to 'rescue identification of human trafficking victims,' adding the word 'identification.'
Assembly Members Connolly and Dixon were added as coauthors of the bill.