AB 1963 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Hiring of real property: portable screening reports: disclosure of application materials.

Summary
Existing law regulates the terms and conditions of residential tenancies, including imposing specified requirements on a security for a rental agreement for residential property. Existing law defines security as any payment, fee, deposit, or charge that is imposed to reimburse the landlord for costs associated with processing a new tenant or that is imposed as an advance payment of rent, used for any purpose, as provided. Existing law authorizes a landlord, or the landlord's agent, who receives a request to rent a residential property from an applicant to charge that applicant an application screening fee to cover the costs of obtaining information about the applicant, as provided. Existing law authorizes a landlord to accept a reusable tenant screening report, as provided, and prohibits the landlord from charging the applicant specified fees, including an application screening fee, if the landlord accepts the reusable tenant screening report. Existing law defines a reusable tenant screening report as a consumer report that, among other things, was prepared within the previous 30 days by a consumer reporting agency at the request and expense of the applicant and is available to the landlord at no cost to access or use. Existing law defines "unfair competition" to include any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue, or misleading advertising and subjects a person who engages, has engaged, or proposes to engage in unfair competition to various remedies and penalties. This bill would repeal the provisions authorizing a landlord to accept reusable tenant screening reports and would, instead, require a landlord to accept from a prospective tenant a portable screening report prepared by a tenant screening company approved by the Department of Housing and Community Development, as provided. The bill would define various terms for these purposes, including defining a "portable screening report" as a consumer report prepared by a tenant screening company that, among other things, is dated within 45 days before submission to the landlord and costs the prospective tenant no more than $45. The bill would prohibit a landlord from, among other things, charging the prospective tenant specified fees associated with processing the rental application, including an application fee, or requiring the prospective tenant to undergo or pay for an additional background check, credit check, or tenant screening, if the prospective tenant provides a portable screening report under these provisions. The bill would require a landlord to advise a prospective tenant in an advertisement for a dwelling unit and before accepting any application materials for a dwelling unit on certain obligations of the landlord regarding portable screening reports. If the landlord rejects an application after reviewing the portable screening report provided by the tenant under these provisions, the bill would require a landlord to provide the prospective tenant with the specific reasons for rejection in writing, as provided. The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to post on its internet website information for prospective tenants about these provisions. This bill would also require a landlord to provide in writing a complete and itemized disclosure of all application requirements to the prospective tenant before accepting any application materials. The bill would require that the disclosure, among other things, be provided in a clear, plain-language, and standardized format, as prescribed by the Department of Housing and Community Development. The bill would prohibit a landlord from adding, modifying, or requesting additional application requirements from a prospective tenant, except as provided, and prohibit a landlord from denying an application based a prospective tenant's failure to provide an application requirement that was not disclosed. The bill would specify that a violation of these provisions is an act of unfair competition, as described above. This bill would make a landlord who violates either of the above-described provisions liable to a prospective tenant in a civil action, as provided. The bill would require a prospective tenant to provide a landlord with an opportunity to cure the violation before bringing a civil action, as provided. The bill would additionally authorize the Attorney General to bring a civil action to seek specified remedies based on violations of its provisions. The bill would provide that these remedies are in addition to any other remedies. This bill would declare that its provisions are severable.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026 Last action Mar 31, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/13/26 - Introduced 03/16/26 - Amended Assembly · 11 edits · Mar 16, 2026
MAJOR
AB 1963 was dramatically expanded from a minor technical correction to the untenantability statute into a comprehensive tenant protection bill that requires landlords to accept portable screening reports (capped at $45, valid for 45 days) and mandates full written disclosure of all application requirements before accepting any materials. The amendment adds two new Civil Code sections and one Health and Safety Code section, establishes civil penalties of $2,500 per violation with Attorney General enforcement authority, and prohibits landlords from using unvalidated AI/algorithmic screening tools to reject applicants.
REQUIREMENT

Landlords are now required to accept a 'portable screening report' prepared by a DHCD-approved tenant screening company. The report must be dated within 45 days, cost the tenant no more than $45, and can be reused across multiple applications during its validity period.

If a prospective tenant provides a portable screening report, the landlord is prohibited from charging any application fee, screening fee, access fee, or other rental-application-related fee, and cannot require an additional background check, credit check, or tenant screening.

Landlords are prohibited from rejecting an application based solely on the tenant's use of a portable screening report instead of the landlord's preferred process, or based on a score from an automated system or AI tool that is not empirically validated and periodically tested for disparate impact on protected classes.

Landlords must provide a complete, itemized written disclosure of all application requirements (documentation, qualification criteria, deposits, timeline) before accepting any application materials. The disclosure must use a DHCD-prescribed plain-language format, be publicly posted where the unit is advertised, and be available in the same languages as the advertisement.

After providing the application requirements disclosure, landlords cannot add, modify, or request additional requirements except if the tenant provided materially false information or the landlord discovers a bona fide error (in which case affected tenants must be notified and offered a full refund).

DHCD must establish and maintain a publicly accessible list of approved tenant screening companies, review and update it at least annually, and post information about the portable screening report requirements on its website (new Health and Safety Code Section 50514.7).

ENFORCEMENT

Violations of both new sections carry civil liability including actual damages, $2,500 statutory damages per violation, attorney's fees, and injunctive relief. A first-time landlord gets a 7-day cure period plus must pay a $50 penalty to avoid full liability. The Attorney General can also bring civil actions seeking up to $2,500 per violation in civil penalties.

Violations of the application requirements disclosure section (new Section 1950.3) are additionally classified as acts of unfair competition under the Business and Professions Code, opening an additional enforcement pathway.

SCOPE

The bill's scope expanded from a single nonsubstantive edit to Civil Code Section 1941.1 (changing 'shall be deemed' to 'is') into a multi-section act adding new provisions to the Civil Code and Health and Safety Code covering tenant screening, application transparency, and enforcement.

DEFINITION

New defined terms include 'portable screening report,' 'tenant screening company,' 'application requirements,' and 'consumer reporting agency.' The old term 'reusable tenant screening report' (30-day validity, optional for landlords) is replaced by the new mandatory framework.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the amendment introduced a state fiscal impact that was not present in the original technical-only version.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
6
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 31, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Tina McKinnor
Tina McKinnor
DDemocratic
CA
61