False reporting.
Summary
Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to report an emergency to specified government entities knowing that report to be false. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to initiate communication with the 911 emergency system with the intent to annoy or harass another person. This bill would make a 2nd or subsequent violation of these provisions punishable as a misdemeanor or felony for a person who was 18 years of age or older at the time the person committed the prior offense or offenses. By increasing the penalty for existing crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law makes an individual convicted of the crimes described above liable to a public agency for the reasonable costs of an emergency response by the public agency. The bill would extend those liability provisions to property damage incurred as a result of the emergency response. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2026
Last action Aug 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/12/26 - Introduced
→
AB1872
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The bill text is identical; the differences are purely technical and relate to how the document is rendered (from a formatted legislative document to a web page layout with navigation menus, search tools, and metadata).
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a plain legislative text layout into a web page presentation. Added elements include navigation menus (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), a quick search box, bill information links, version tracking, and sharing options. The actual statutory language of Sections 148.3, 653x, and the reimbursement provision in Section 3 is unchanged.
Floor votes · Assembly May 21, 2026
How they voted
64–0
Passed · 15 other
Total votes 79
May 21, 2026
D
Democratic59
77% Yea
R
Republican20
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 5200.)
lower
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tri Ta
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1872
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1872. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline