State Air Resources Board: South Coast Air Quality Management District: regulations: prohibition: costs.
Summary
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. This bill would prohibit the state board from adopting any regulation or rule that would add more than $0.02 to the cost of a gallon of gasoline or add $2,000 or more to the cost to build any home. The bill would require the state board to submit data to the relevant policy committees of the Legislature that demonstrates how a proposed regulation is compliant with this prohibition. Existing law, the Lewis-Presley Air Quality Management Act, establishes the South Coast Air Quality Management District in those portions of the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino included within the South Coast Air Basin as the local agency with the responsibility for comprehensive air pollution control within the basin. This bill would prohibit the south coast district from adopting any regulation or rule that would add more than $0.02 to the cost of a gallon of gasoline, add $2,000 or more to the cost to build any home, or add $5,000 or more to the cost to build a nonresidential building. The bill would require the south coast district to submit data to the relevant policy committees of the Legislature that demonstrates how a proposed regulation is compliant with this prohibition. To the extent it would impose additional duties on a local entity, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2026
Last action Feb 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/10/26 - Introduced
→
AB1791
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made to AB 1791 between these two versions. The diff reflects a change in document format from a plain-text or PDF-style rendering to an HTML web page layout, adding website navigation elements (search boxes, links, menu items) around the same bill text. All legislative provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a plain-text bill rendering into a web page layout with added navigation elements (Quick Search, Bill Number, Bill Keyword fields, sidebar links for Votes/History/Status, share buttons, and date published stamp). The underlying bill text, including all three sections and the legislative counsel's digest, is unchanged.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Feb 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kate Sanchez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1791
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1791. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline