Prisons: classification.
Summary
Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to evaluate a person who is newly committed to a state prison and classify incarcerated persons based on the evaluations, and, when reasonable, assign or reassign an incarcerated person to the institution of the appropriate security level and gender population nearest the incarcerated person's home, unless other classification factors make that placement unreasonable. This bill would require the department to contract with an independent research entity to conduct a study to reassess the entire security classification system, as specified. The bill would require the study to contain policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of the classification system, as specified. The bill would require the selected research entity to perform the study according to specified criteria, including, among others, that the entity is governed by the University of California Board of Regents and has demonstrated expertise on Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation policy and data. The bill would require the report to be published on or before January 1, 2030, and would repeal the provisions as of January 1, 2031.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 9, 2026
Last action Aug 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
05/18/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB1759
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of AB 1759. The diff reflects a transition from a plain-text legislative document format to a web page rendering of the same bill, with added navigation elements and layout changes. All operative provisions, dates, criteria, and requirements remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a plain-text legislative layout into a web page structure, adding navigation links (home, accessibility, FAQ, sitemap, login), search functionality, and bill tracking tools. No policy language was altered.
Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
77–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 79
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic59
96% Yea
R
Republican20
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 27, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.)
lower
May 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 14, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sade Elhawary
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1759
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1759. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline