Postrelease community supervision.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to notify the sheriff or chief of police, or both, and the district attorney where certain parolees were convicted and are scheduled to be released of specified information related to the parolee prior to their release. Existing law requires the department to, upon request, provide to the officials described above specified information available to the department, including photographs and fingerprints, concerning persons on parole who may be residing in that city or county, as specified. This bill would additionally require the department to notify the county chief probation officer of, or to provide upon request to the officer, as appropriate, the information described above. Existing law subjects a person to no more than 3 years of postrelease community supervision after release from prison or after the person's term of imprisonment has been deemed to have been served, except as specified. Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to, among other things, inform each prisoner subject to postrelease community supervision of their responsibility to report to the county probation department. Existing law requires the department, 30 days before release, to notify the county of all information that would otherwise be required for parolees, as specified. This bill would require the department to provide the county probation department written and verbal notification of the scheduled release date of the person and the information described above no less than 90 days before the person's release, and if the discharge date is set or reset for 90 or fewer days into the future, would require the department to provide notification within 5 business days, but no later than 30 days before the discharge date of the person. The bill would require the department to notify the county probation department of the county in which a person is being released of the name and contact information of the prerelease care manager, postrelease care manager, and enhanced care manager for the person being released to ensure California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM) processes are integrated with local reentry service delivery and court-ordered conditions. The bill would require, if a county probation department identifies, prior to the release of a person, that the person's current county of residence may be different than the county of the person's last legal residence, the department to coordinate with the probation department to determine the person's current county of residence and to develop coordinated plans for the release and transport of the released person to the person's current county of residence. By increasing duties on county probation departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2026
Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/05/26 - Introduced
→
AB1737
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same bill text from a printed legislative document layout (with page numbers, line numbers, and column formatting) into a web page presentation format. All statutory provisions, notification timelines, eligibility criteria, and funding language remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout with page headers, footers, and line numbers into a plain web page format with navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.). No changes to the actual statutory language were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Co
Bob Archuleta
DDemocratic
Co
Cottie Petrie-Norris
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1737
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1737. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline