Property tax: welfare exemption.
Summary
The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to exempt from taxation, in whole or in part, property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, or charitable purposes, and is owned or held in trust by a nonprofit entity. Pursuant to that authority, existing law provides for a welfare exemption under which property used exclusively for an exempt purpose and owned and operated by specified entities, including foundations, limited liability companies, or corporations meeting certain statutory requirements is exempt from taxation. Existing law also provides that property used exclusively for the preservation of specified natural resources or open-space lands owned or operated by a specified entity meeting specified criteria is deemed to be included within the welfare exemption. Existing law makes that provision operative up to, and including, the lien date in 2027 and repeals that provision on January 1, 2028. This bill would extend the above-described operative date up to, and including, the lien date in 2032 and would extend the corresponding repeal date to January 1, 2033. By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would state that it is the intent of the Legislature to apply those requirements to the bill and would set forth specified information relating to those requirements. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 29, 2026
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/24/26 - Enrolled
→
AB1668
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The bill text, including all sections amending Section 214.02 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, is identical in both versions. The differences are purely presentational: the first version is the formal enrolled certificate document with blank signature lines, while the second is a web page rendering from the California Legislature website that adds navigation elements, a digest key summary, and bill history metadata.
TECHNICAL
The document changed from a formal enrolled certificate format (with blank spaces for governor's approval date, time, and signature) to a web page layout with navigation menus, a digest key showing Vote: MAJORITY, Appropriation: NO, Fiscal Committee: YES, Local Program: YES, and a bill history timeline.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2026 · Assembly May 26, 2026
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 20, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Aug 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Jun 22, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0.)
lower
May 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5271.)
lower
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 13, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 20, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Feb 17, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Gail Pellerin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1668
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1668. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline