County employees' retirement: cost-of-living adjustments.
Summary
The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes counties to establish retirement systems for county employees, authorizes counties to establish a board of retirement, and authorizes the board of retirement to provide cost-of-living adjustments and certain supplemental cost-of-living allowances. Existing law, applicable to Sonoma County and Imperial County, authorizes the board of retirement, with approval of the county board of supervisors, to grant a cost-of-living adjustment on a prefunded basis to the retirement allowances, optional death allowances, or annual death allowances payable to or on account of eligible members. This bill would permit the board of supervisors for Sonoma County, on an annual basis, to authorize a cost-of-living adjustment to the retirement allowances, optional death allowances, or annual death allowances payable by the retirement system. Before authorizing a cost-of-living adjustment, the bill would require the county board of supervisors to take various actions, including collaborating with the retirement board to identify the eligible retired members, survivors, beneficiaries, or successors in interest designated, or a subset of those benefit recipients, to receive the cost-of-living adjustment, the amount thereof, and the funding source. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for Sonoma County.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 16, 2026
Last action Aug 24, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/19/26 - Enrolled
→
AB1601
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same enrolled bill text from a traditional legislative document layout (with signatures, page numbers, and chapter placeholders) into a web-based presentation format that includes navigation elements, metadata, and status information. The actual statutory language of Section 31874.7 and Section 2 is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional enrolled document layout (with Assembly/Senate passage signatures, Governor receipt line, page numbers, and chapter number placeholder) into a web-based presentation that includes site navigation elements, bill status metadata, version history, and a digest key showing Vote: MAJORITY, Appropriation: NO, Fiscal Committee: NO, Local Program: NO.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2026 · Assembly Apr 16, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Aug 18, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Aug 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0.).
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
May 6, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 3. Page 4679.)
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. E. & R.
lower
Jan 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Rogers
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1601
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1601. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline