Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act: collective bargaining: unfair labor practices.
Summary
Existing law, the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, administered by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) , provides for negotiations concerning wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment between a higher education employer, as defined, and representatives of recognized employee organizations. Existing law grants higher education employees the right to form, join, and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations and for the purpose of meeting and conferring with their employer. Existing law authorizes an employer and an exclusive representative who enter into a written memorandum of understanding to agree to procedures for final and binding arbitration of disputes that may arise under the memorandum of understanding or between the parties. Existing law makes it unlawful for the higher education employer to, among other things, refuse or fail to meet and confer with an exclusive representative. This bill would, with respect to arbitrations over violations of a collective bargaining agreement for the contracting out of bargaining unit work, make it an unfair practice for a higher education employer to, among other things, circumvent or disregard an arbitrator's decision by extending or renewing an existing contract or entering into a new contract for the same or similar services at the same location, or violating a contract term already interpreted by an arbitrator to prohibit the employer's conduct. This bill would prohibit PERB, among other things, from deferring repeat offenses in the above-described cases to subsequent arbitration proceedings. The bill would require remedies for a violation of these provisions to include the charging party's attorney's fees and costs.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Last action Jun 17, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
05/18/26 - Amended Assembly
→
06/08/26 - Amended Senate
·
3 edits
·
Jun 8, 2026
MINOR
The Senate amendment to AB 1582 made two substantive policy changes: it removed the $1,000 per day civil penalty for repeat offenders who circumvent arbitration awards on contracting-out disputes, and it added 'services at the same location' as a clarifying element in the definition of circumvention. The bill also underwent language cleanup to remove redundancies. The removal of the penalty provision eliminates a key financial enforcement tool against higher education employers who repeatedly disregard arbitrator decisions.
Scope change
The scope of the circumvention provision was slightly narrowed by adding the 'same location' requirement, while the enforcement mechanism was weakened by removing the civil penalty for repeat offenders. The bill's overall applicability to higher education employers and contracting-out disputes remains unchanged.
ENFORCEMENT
Removed the entire civil penalties provision that authorized PERB to award $1,000 per day in penalties against repeat offenders who circumvent arbitration awards on contracting-out disputes. This also removed the requirement that collected penalties be deposited into the state general fund.
DEFINITION
Added 'services at the same location' as an additional element in the definition of circumventing an arbitrator's decision, narrowing the scope by requiring the new or renewed contract to involve services at the same location as the original.
TECHNICAL
Cleaned up redundant and awkward language throughout the bill, including removing duplicate words like 'contract, contract' and 'services, services' that appeared in both the summary and operative text.
Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
66–7
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 79
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic59
96% Yea
R
Republican20
45% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Jun 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 8, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
May 27, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-7-6)
assembly
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 7.)
lower
May 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 14, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (May 14).
lower
May 6, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. E. & R.
lower
Jan 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 13.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1582
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1582. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline