Workers' compensation: medical treatment.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee, as defined, for injuries sustained in the course of employment. Existing law requires an employer to provide medical treatment that is reasonably required to cure or relieve an employee from the effects of the injury. Existing law allows employers to create networks of medical treatment providers to send employees to for treatment. Existing law sets out criteria for these networks and exceptions for when an employee may be treated outside of the network. This bill would require the administrative director to establish a statewide medical provider network database, consisting of physicians who are willing and able to treat injured employees in the San Joaquin Valley region. The bill would require an employee to first seek treatment within their employer's or insurer's network, unless the employer's or insurer's network is unable to treat the employee within 30 days of the request for medical treatment. The bill would require physicians, in order to be included in the network, to, among other things, be in good standing with the Medical Board of California and agree to comply with the official medical fee schedule, as specified. The bill would require the administrative director to implement the network on or before January 1, 2027. The bill would state the Legislature's intent to address the shortage of available medical treatment for workplace injuries in the central valley region. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/21/25 - Introduced
→
AB1498
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of AB 1498. The differences are entirely presentational: the bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers and page breaks) into a web page format (adding navigation elements like 'skip to content,' 'home,' 'accessibility,' and search fields). All operative provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed legislative document style (with line numbers, page headers/footers, and fixed-width layout) into a web page presentation with navigation menus, a quick search bar, and a digest key section. No changes to the actual statutory language, definitions, eligibility criteria, timelines, or enforcement mechanisms were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Esmeralda Soria
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1498
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1498. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline