Peace officers.
Summary
Existing law defines persons who are peace officers and the entities authorized to appoint them. Existing law prescribes certain minimum standards for a person to be appointed as a peace officer, including moral character and physical and mental condition, and certain disqualifying factors for a person to be employed as a peace officer, including a felony conviction. This bill would require a law enforcement agency that employs a peace officer to have a policy prohibiting that officer from carrying any firearm when the officer has a blood alcohol concentration greater than 0.00%, whether the officer is on duty or off duty, unless the officer is on duty and engaged in an undercover assignment in the course of their employment as a peace officer. By imposing new duties on local law enforcement, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/22/25 - Amended Assembly
→
AB1489
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of AB 1489. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same bill text from a PDF-style layout (with line numbers, page breaks, and specific indentation) to a web-based presentation format that includes navigation elements and a different structural layout. The actual statutory language, digest, and mandates provision are identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a print-style layout with line numbers and page breaks into a web-based document structure with navigation menus (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.) and section headers (Bill Information, Bill Search, Text, Votes, History, Status). No policy language was added, removed, or altered.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 7, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isaac Bryan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1489
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1489. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline