Self-defense.
What changed between versions
The bill was renamed the 'Preemptive Self Defense Act of 2025' and now amends Civil Code Section 50 and Penal Code Sections 692 and 693 in addition to the original technical fix to Penal Code Section 16.
Civil Code Section 50 now provides that no civil liability or cause of action accrues against a person who lawfully resists a public offense. Exceptions apply if the person was the primary aggressor or used force not proportional to the reasonably perceived threat.
Penal Code Section 692 now allows lawful resistance by 'a party who reasonably perceives an imminent threat of bodily harm,' not just a party about to be injured. The new definition of 'imminent threat of bodily harm' includes deliberate feints, fake strikes, or aggressive movements intended to provoke a reaction or create fear of an immediate attack.
Penal Code Section 693 now requires that resistance be proportional to the reasonably perceived threat and must cease when the threat is no longer present. A party need not wait until a physical attack has begun before taking reasonable defensive action.
A party's background, training, and professional fighting skills are explicitly barred from being considered when determining whether defensive action was reasonable.
The fiscal committee determination changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now has state fiscal implications.