AB 1488 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Self-defense.

Summary
Existing law authorizes a party about to be injured to lawfully resist the commission of a public offense and to use sufficient resistance to prevent the offense. Existing case law provides that, in order to justify an act of self-defense, an individual must have a reasonable belief that the threat is imminent, and limits the right of self-defense to the use of that force that is reasonable under the circumstances. This bill, the Preemptive Self Defense Act of 2025, would clarify that a party who reasonably perceives an imminent threat of bodily harm may make lawful resistance to the commission of a public offense and that the resistance authorized is required to be proportional to the reasonably perceived threat and to cease when the threat is no longer present. The bill would prohibit a party's background, training, and professional fighting skills from being taken into account when determining whether a party has taken reasonable defensive action. Existing law authorizes necessary force to be used to protect from wrongful injury the person or property of oneself, or of a spouse, child, parent, or other relative, or member of one's family, or of a ward, servant, master, or guest. This bill would also specify that there shall not be any civil liability on the part of, and no cause of action shall accrue against, a person who lawfully resists a public offense, as described above.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/21/25 - Introduced 03/24/25 - Amended Assembly · 6 edits · Mar 24, 2025
MODERATE
AB 1488 was transformed from a minor technical amendment to the definition of crimes into the 'Preemptive Self Defense Act of 2025,' which substantially expands self-defense rights by allowing individuals to act before a physical attack begins when they reasonably perceive an imminent threat, defines that threat broadly to include feints and provocative movements, grants civil immunity for lawful resistance, and bars courts from considering a defender's martial arts training or fighting background when assessing reasonableness.
Scope change
The bill expanded dramatically from a purely technical cleanup of the crime classification statute to a comprehensive self-defense reform that creates new preemptive self-defense rights, broadens the definition of imminent threat, adds civil immunity for lawful resistance, and limits how courts may evaluate a defender's reasonableness.
SCOPE

The bill was renamed the 'Preemptive Self Defense Act of 2025' and now amends Civil Code Section 50 and Penal Code Sections 692 and 693 in addition to the original technical fix to Penal Code Section 16.

Civil Code Section 50 now provides that no civil liability or cause of action accrues against a person who lawfully resists a public offense. Exceptions apply if the person was the primary aggressor or used force not proportional to the reasonably perceived threat.

ELIGIBILITY

Penal Code Section 692 now allows lawful resistance by 'a party who reasonably perceives an imminent threat of bodily harm,' not just a party about to be injured. The new definition of 'imminent threat of bodily harm' includes deliberate feints, fake strikes, or aggressive movements intended to provoke a reaction or create fear of an immediate attack.

REQUIREMENT

Penal Code Section 693 now requires that resistance be proportional to the reasonably perceived threat and must cease when the threat is no longer present. A party need not wait until a physical attack has begun before taking reasonable defensive action.

ENFORCEMENT

A party's background, training, and professional fighting skills are explicitly barred from being considered when determining whether defensive action was reasonable.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee determination changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now has state fiscal implications.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors