Landlord-tenant: internet service provider subscriptions.
What changed between versions
Coverage expanded from 'tenancy commenced or renewed' to 'residential tenancy commenced, renewed, or continuing on a month-to-month or other periodic basis.' This means existing tenants on month-to-month or other periodic leases are now protected, not just those entering new or renewed fixed-term leases.
Changed the description of covered services from those 'offered as part of residing in the dwelling unit' to those provided 'in connection with the lease,' which is a broader and more lease-focused framing.
The outright prohibition on landlords requiring tenants to subscribe to a specific internet service provider was removed. The bill no longer bans the practice itself; it only requires that an opt-out option be provided.
The tenant right changed from 'opt out of any subscription' to 'opt out of paying for any subscription.' This is a narrower protection: tenants can refuse to pay but the language no longer clearly lets them reject the service arrangement entirely.
Added the phrase 'such as through a bulk-billing arrangement' to clarify that the opt-out applies to arrangements where the landlord bundles ISP costs into rent or charges.