AB 1349 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Consumer protection: ticket sellers.

Summary
Existing law provides comprehensive regulation of ticket sellers, defined as a person who, for compensation, commission, or otherwise, sells admission tickets to a sporting, musical, theater, or any other entertainment event. In this regard, existing law, among other things, prohibits specified ticket selling practices and imposes certain recordkeeping and disclosure requirements. If an event is canceled, existing law requires that the ticket price be fully refunded to the consumer whether by an original seller, event presenter, ticket reseller, or ticket resale marketplace, as specified. If an event is postponed, rescheduled, or replaced with another event at the same date and time, existing law requires the ticket seller to fully refund the purchaser upon request, as provided. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor, and imposes civil penalties for certain violations. Existing unfair competition laws make various unfair competition practices unlawful, including any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue, or misleading advertising. Existing law makes it unlawful for any person doing business in California and advertising to consumers in California to make any false or misleading advertising claim. Existing law makes a person who violates specified false advertising provisions liable for a civil penalty, as specified, and provides that a person who violates those false advertising provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would generally revise and recast the provisions regulating the sale of event tickets to impose similar requirements, as applicable, to original sellers, event presenters, ticket resellers, and ticket resale marketplaces, as defined. This bill would prohibit a ticket seller from engaging in a speculative ticket sale, as defined. The bill would require that a ticket resale marketplace implement reasonable measures designed to prevent speculative ticket sales on its platform. The bill would make an original seller, ticket reseller, or ticket retail marketplace that violates particular law and fails to supply a ticket, as specified, civilly liable to the ticket purchaser for 2 times the contracted price of the ticket, in addition to any sum expended by the purchaser in nonrefundable expenses for attending or attempting to attend the event, and other fees and costs. This bill would make certain acts unlawful, including purchasing tickets in excess of posted limits for an online event ticket sale and circumventing or evading a ticket distribution control, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a person from using an internet website or address that is substantially similar to the internet website of an event presenter, venue operator, rights holder, original seller, or an authorized agent with intent to confuse or deceive consumers, as specified. The bill would make a violation of these provisions false or misleading advertising. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By expanding the scope of certain requirements related to selling those tickets, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons

What changed between versions

06/24/26 - Amended Senate 06/26/26 - Amended Senate · 8 edits · Jun 26, 2026
MODERATE
The June 26 Senate amendment to AB 1349 (ticket seller consumer protection) makes several substantive changes: it broadens the anti-botting provision by lowering the mental state from 'intentionally' to 'knowingly' and expanding covered conduct, adds specific 30-day refund timeframes and a local bond requirement for ticket refunds, streamlines the definitions section by removing several terms, and restructures the speculative ticket sale prohibition. These changes tighten enforcement against ticket scalping tools while adding consumer protections around refund timing.
ENFORCEMENT

Section 22505.5 (anti-botting/scalping) changed the required mental state from 'intentionally' to 'knowingly,' which is a lower threshold and makes it easier to prove a violation. The section also expanded from merely 'sell' software or services to 'provide, sell, offer for sale, market, or facilitate' them, broadening who can be held liable.

Section 22502.3 (civil liability for failing to supply a ticket) was expanded to explicitly name 'original seller, ticket reseller, or ticket retail marketplace' as parties subject to the two-times-price civil penalty, rather than relying solely on the general term 'ticket seller.'

REQUIREMENT

Section 22505.5 added a new subdivision prohibiting the use of software, services, automated means, or other technological methods to automate, coordinate, facilitate, or otherwise enable conduct already prohibited by that section, creating a separate basis for liability against tool developers and facilitators.

Section 22502.1 (speculative ticket sales) was restructured. The old version required ticket resale marketplaces to verify possession before accepting listings and stated that allowing a listing constituted confirmation of compliance. The new version removes that 'confirmation' language and instead requires marketplaces to implement 'reasonable measures designed to prevent speculative ticket sales on its platform.'

Section 22505.5 removed the provision that made it unlawful to purchase tickets in violation of the event presenter's or venue operator's posted terms and conditions, which had been a separate ground for liability.

TIMELINE

Section 22507 added a requirement that refunds for canceled events be provided within 30 calendar days of the cancellation, and that refunds for postponed or rescheduled events be provided within 30 calendar days of the consumer's refund request.

FISCAL

Section 22507 added a provision allowing local jurisdictions to require original sellers, ticket resellers, or ticket resale marketplaces to post a bond of up to $50,000 to secure refunds required under that section.

DEFINITION

Section 22503 (definitions) was significantly streamlined. Removed definitions for 'Artist,' 'Constructive possession' (now defined within Section 22502.1), 'Entertainment venue,' 'Face price,' 'Live entertainment event,' 'Premium seat license,' 'Professional athletic team,' and 'Ticket.' The definition of 'Ticket reseller' was narrowed to specify 'on the secondary market' and exclude consumers and season ticket holders.

Floor votes · Assembly Jan 26, 2026

How they voted

650
Passed · 14 other
Total votes 79
Jan 26, 2026
D Democratic59
51 Yea 8
86% Yea
R Republican20
14 Yea 6
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
32
Key actions
12
Committee
13
Amendments
11
Aug 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 26, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Jun 24, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Jun 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. P. & E.D., P., D.T., & C.P. and JUD.
upper
Jan 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 0. Page 3836.)
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (January 22).
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 1, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on A.,E.,S., & T., P. & C.P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors

Sponsors