AB 1337 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Information Practices Act of 1977.

Summary
Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977, prescribes a set of requirements, prohibitions, and remedies applicable to agencies, as defined, with regard to their collection, storage, and disclosure of personal information, as defined. Existing law exempts from the provisions of the act counties, cities, any city and county, school districts, municipal corporations, districts, political subdivisions, and other local public agencies, as specified. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2028, recast those provisions to, among other things, remove that exemption for local agencies, and would revise and expand the definition of "personal information." The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive, and conforming changes. Because the bill would expand the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires an agency to provide on or with any form used to collect personal information from individuals an initial notice that includes specified information, followed by a periodic notice of not more than one-year intervals, as provided. This bill would make changes to that notice requirement, including requiring periodic notice at least once every three years. Existing law requires an agency to establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the design, development, operation, disclosure, or maintenance of records containing personal information and instruct those persons with respect to specified rules relevant to the act. This bill would provide that the above-described rules of conduct shall be subject to any limitations or conditions set forth in any applicable collective bargaining agreement, and would prohibit an agency from using records containing personal information for any purpose or purposes other than the purpose or purposes for which that personal information was collected, except as required or authorized by state or local law. Existing law prohibits an agency from disclosing any personal information in a manner that would link the information disclosed to the individual to whom it pertains, except under specified circumstances. This bill would revise the circumstances that may allow the disclosure of personal information in a manner that could link the information disclosed to the individual to whom it pertains, including by authorizing disclosure for specified purposes related to real property, social safety net programs, and medical information, and would make conforming changes. Existing law makes an intentional violation of any provision of the act, or of any rules or regulations adopted under the act, by an officer or employee of any agency a cause for discipline, including termination of employment. This bill would also make a negligent violation of the act a cause for discipline. Existing law provides that the intentional disclosure of medical, psychiatric, or psychological information in violation of the disclosure provisions of the act, that is not otherwise permitted by law, is punishable as a misdemeanor if the wrongful disclosure results in economic loss or personal injury to the individual to whom the information pertains. This bill would remove the requirement that the wrongful disclosure result in economic loss or personal injury. Because the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime by deleting this condition, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Jun 25, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/08/25 - Amended Assembly 05/23/25 - Amended Assembly · 5 edits · May 23, 2025
MODERATE
AB 1337 was amended to broaden the definition of 'personal information' by removing redundant qualifying language, expand the circumstances under which agencies may disclose personal information to the federal government (from only when 'required' by law to when 'required or authorized'), and incorporate the expanded Section 1798.3 definition into the breach notification provisions. These changes make it easier for state agencies to share data with federal authorities and widen the range of data types that trigger mandatory breach notification.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'personal information' in Section 1798.3 was simplified by removing the phrase 'that is maintained by an agency that identifies or describes an individual,' leaving only 'any information that identifies, relates to, describes, or is capable of being associated with, a particular individual.' This removes a potentially limiting qualifier and makes the definition cleaner.

SCOPE

Section 1798.24(f) was changed from permitting disclosure to a branch of the federal government only when 'required by state or federal law' to when 'required authorized by state or federal law.' This adds 'authorized' as an additional legal basis, meaning agencies can now share personal information with the federal government whenever federal or state law authorizes (not just requires) such disclosure.

REQUIREMENT

A new item was added to the breach notification section (Section 1798.26, subdivision (g)) that cross-references the full definition of 'personal information' from Section 1798.3. This means all data types covered by the expanded definition - including neural data, genetic data, biometric information, precise geolocation, and audio/visual/thermal data - now trigger breach notification obligations, not just the previously enumerated categories.

TECHNICAL

Section 1798.24(q) was clarified to fix confusing duplicate language about legislative staff access. The old text read 'the Member's Member of the Legislature's staff if authorized in writing by the Member, Member of the Legislature' and was corrected to 'the Member of the Legislature's staff if authorized in writing by the Member of the Legislature.'

Minor typo correction: 'video tapes' changed to 'videotapes' in the list of physical formats for personal information.

Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2025

How they voted

630
Passed · 15 other
Total votes 78
Jun 3, 2025
D Democratic59
56 Yea 3
94% Yea
R Republican19
7 Yea 12
36% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
5
Jun 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 12, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 1, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Jun 1, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 6, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jul 15, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-15)
assembly
Jun 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 64. Noes 0. Page 1921.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Chris Ward
Chris Ward
DDemocratic
CA
78