AB 1313 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Water quality: permits.

Summary
Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards regulate water quality and prescribe waste discharge requirements in accordance with the federal national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) permit program established by the federal Clean Water Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Existing law requires each regional board to formulate and adopt water quality control plans for all areas within the region, as provided. The bill would require the state board, after making the necessary residual designation authority findings, to establish a statewide commercial, industrial, and institutional NPDES order for properties with 5 acres or more of impervious surface, as provided. The bill would require the state board to publish a draft order of the statewide order for public comment on or before December 31, 2028, or 18 months after the reissuance of a specified statewide permit, as specified. The bill would require the state board to contemporaneously establish rules for offsite compliance agreements to issue with the publication of the draft statewide order for public comment that details the necessary components of an agreement between commercial, industrial, and institutional permittees and local municipalities for achieving offsite stormwater capture and use within the adopted final statewide commercial, industrial, and institutional NPDES order. The bill would require the NPDES order to include multiple compliance options for discharges to select and comply with to be deemed in compliance with applicable water quality based effluent limitations, including, but not limited to, compliance options incentivizing green infrastructure onsite or offsite stormwater capture and use.
Bill status died 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

05/27/25 - Amended Assembly AB1313 · 4 edits
MODERATE
The May 27, 2025 amendment to AB 1313 made several substantive changes to how the statewide commercial, industrial, and institutional NPDES order would operate. The most significant change replaced the requirement for the state board to develop a model memorandum of understanding with a requirement to establish rules for offsite compliance agreements, shifting from a voluntary agreement framework to a regulatory rulemaking approach. Additional changes clarified that dischargers (not discharges) select compliance options and added the word 'incentivizing' before green infrastructure options.
REQUIREMENT

Section 2(a)(2): Changed the offsite compliance mechanism from requiring the state board to 'develop a model memorandum of understanding that details the necessary components of an agreement between permittees and local municipalities' to requiring the board to 'establish rules for offsite compliance agreements.' This shifts the approach from a template-based voluntary MOU to a formal rulemaking process, giving the state board more direct regulatory authority over how offsite stormwater capture arrangements work.

Section 2(b): Added the word 'incentivizing' before 'green infrastructure onsite or offsite stormwater capture and use,' making explicit that these compliance options are meant to provide incentives (such as cost offsets or reduced requirements) rather than simply being available alternatives.

DEFINITION

Section 2(b): Changed 'for discharges to select and comply with' to 'for dischargers to select and comply with in order to be deemed in compliance.' This clarifies that it is the entities (dischargers) who choose their compliance pathway, not the discharges themselves, and adds 'in order to' for grammatical precision about the legal effect of selecting a compliance option.

TECHNICAL

The impervious surface threshold was changed from 'five acres or more' (spelled out) to '5 acres or more' (numeral) in the legislative counsel's digest, though the operative statutory text in Section 2(a)(1) retains 'five acres or more.' This is a formatting consistency change rather than a substantive policy change.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
2
May 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1744.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (May 23).
lower
May 21, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Diane Papan
Diane Papan
DDemocratic
CA
21