Water quality: permits.
What changed between versions
Section 2(a)(2): Changed the offsite compliance mechanism from requiring the state board to 'develop a model memorandum of understanding that details the necessary components of an agreement between permittees and local municipalities' to requiring the board to 'establish rules for offsite compliance agreements.' This shifts the approach from a template-based voluntary MOU to a formal rulemaking process, giving the state board more direct regulatory authority over how offsite stormwater capture arrangements work.
Section 2(b): Added the word 'incentivizing' before 'green infrastructure onsite or offsite stormwater capture and use,' making explicit that these compliance options are meant to provide incentives (such as cost offsets or reduced requirements) rather than simply being available alternatives.
Section 2(b): Changed 'for discharges to select and comply with' to 'for dischargers to select and comply with in order to be deemed in compliance.' This clarifies that it is the entities (dischargers) who choose their compliance pathway, not the discharges themselves, and adds 'in order to' for grammatical precision about the legal effect of selecting a compliance option.
The impervious surface threshold was changed from 'five acres or more' (spelled out) to '5 acres or more' (numeral) in the legislative counsel's digest, though the operative statutory text in Section 2(a)(1) retains 'five acres or more.' This is a formatting consistency change rather than a substantive policy change.