Air districts: administrative rulemaking: standardized regulatory impact analysis.
What changed between versions
Added Section 40007 to the Health and Safety Code requiring certain air districts to comply with the standardized regulatory impact analysis process (Government Code Section 11346.3) when adopting, amending, or repealing major regulations with economic impacts exceeding $50 million.
The new requirement only applies to air districts with jurisdiction over a geographic area with a population of over five million people or one-eighth of the state's population, whichever is greater. This targets the largest air districts such as South Coast AQMD and Bay Area AQMD.
Air districts are exempt from two requirements that apply to state agencies: they do not have to submit their standardized regulatory impact analysis to the Department of Finance for review, and DOF is not required to review it. If a district does not submit, or if DOF does not review within 30 days of submission, the district makes a finding of compliance.
Added a state mandate reimbursement provision (Section 3) stating no reimbursement is required because local agencies can levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to cover the mandated program costs. If the Commission on State Mandates finds other mandated costs, reimbursement would be required under existing law.
Added legislative findings and declarations (Section 1) stating that early public input on economic effects of major regulations improves rulemaking, and expressing intent to extend the $50 million threshold standardized analysis process to large air districts regulating areas with the state's largest employment bases.
The original nonsubstantive fix to Government Code Section 11342.548 (changing 'any a proposed adoption' to 'a proposed adoption') is retained but renumbered as Section 4 of the amended bill.