Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act of 2025.
What changed between versions
New Section 71372(c) requires all interest earned on moneys deposited into the fund to be retained in the fund for use in implementing the program, rather than being available for other state purposes.
The fund name was changed from 'Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Fund' to 'Polluters Pay Climate Superfund,' removing the redundant word 'Fund.'
Qualifying expenditures language was changed from 'shall include, but are not limited to' to 'may include, but are not limited to,' and additional categories were added including transportation in emergency response, support for local and tribal government operational continuity during climate events, and maintaining, enhancing, and expanding zero-emission public transit operations to increase ridership.
Section 71371.5(b) was broadened: a responsible party can now seek an adjustment if any portion of its cost recovery demand is attributable to fossil fuel extracted by another responsible party (previously limited to refining of crude oil extracted by another party).
The definition of disadvantaged communities in Section 71372.1(a) was changed from 'as defined by the agency' to 'as defined by the agency pursuant to Section 39711 of the Health and Safety Code,' tying it to a specific existing statutory definition.
The responsible party emissions threshold was clarified from 'more than one billion metric tons' to 'more than one billion 1,000,000,000 metric tons,' spelling out the number explicitly.
New Section 71372.2 adds a severability provision: if a court determines any expenditure from the fund for a project or program is inconsistent with law, funding for remaining projects and programs is severable and unaffected.
The definition of 'covered fossil fuel emissions' was clarified to specify 'total quantity' and to explicitly include emissions 'including by third parties,' making clear that downstream combustion by end users counts toward the responsible party's emissions.
New legislative findings (7), (8), and (9) were added stating that existing damage accounting is significantly undercounted, that the fees represent only a subset of extraordinary climate costs, and that the industry has earned $2.8 billion per day in profits over 50 years while externalizing pollution costs.
New subsection (c) added to Section 2 stating it is the intent of the Legislature for the act, the program, and all funded projects to benefit disadvantaged communities and to do no harm to these communities.
A new paragraph (6) was added to the climate cost study requirements in Section 71371.3(b), requiring an analysis of climate impacts to local and tribal government budgets, including increased costs for infrastructure maintenance, emergency services, natural disaster recovery, and public health.