Public Utilities Commission: organization.
Summary
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, as defined. Existing law establishes within the commission an ethics officer within the legal division of the commission who is designated by the general counsel of the commission. Existing law requires the ethics officer to institute a program of enhanced ethics training for all commissioners and employees of the commission and to provide confidential advice to commissioners and employees of the commission relative to the commission's Conflict of Interest Code, Statement of Incompatible Activities, and limitations on ex parte communications. This bill would require the commission, on or before July 1, 2026, to establish an online portal or email address to report ethics concerns to the commission. This bill would prohibit a staff member who is employed by the commission from working on a proceeding at the commission for which the staff member, before their employment by the commission, was listed on a formal filing for the proceeding or sponsored testimony within the proceeding.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
05/05/25 - Amended Assembly
→
AB1173
·
2 edits
MINOR
The diff between these two versions is primarily a formatting and presentation change, converting from a plain-text legislative document to a web-page rendering of the same bill. The only substantive policy change is a minor clarification in Section 307.3, where the phrase 'while employed at the office' was replaced with the full name 'while employed at the Public Advocate's Office of the Public Utilities Commission' for precision.
TECHNICAL
Section 307.3 changed the reference from 'the office' to the full name 'the Public Advocate's Office of the Public Utilities Commission' when describing the prior employment context that triggers the recusal requirement. This is a drafting clarification, not a policy change.
The document was reformatted from a plain-text legislative bill layout into a web-page presentation with navigation elements, search tools, and metadata headers. No substantive content was added or removed beyond the one-word-phrase clarification above.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 1, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Mar 26, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joe Patterson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1173
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1173. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline