AB 1157 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Tenancy: just cause termination: rent increases.

Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits the owner of a residential real property from terminating a tenancy without just cause, as defined, after a tenant has continuously and lawfully occupied a residential real property for 12 months. Among other residential real properties or residential circumstances, existing law exempts from these provisions a residential real property, including a mobilehome, that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit if the owner meets specified criteria and the tenants have been provided a specified written notice of the exemption. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2030. This bill would revise these provisions by removing the exemption for separately alienable residential real property and, instead, only exempting a mobilehome if the above-described criteria are met. The bill would delete the January 1, 2030, repeal date, thereby extending these provisions indefinitely. (2) Existing law prohibits an owner of residential real property, except as specified, from increasing over the course of any 12-month period the gross rental rate for a dwelling or a unit more than 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 10%, whichever is lower, of the lowest gross rental rate charged for that dwelling or unit at any time during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the increase, as specified. This bill would reduce the permissible gross rental rate increase under these provisions to the lesser of 2% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 5%. Among other residential real properties, existing law exempts from these provisions a residential real property that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit, including a mobilehome, if the owner meets specified criteria and the tenants have been provided a specified written notice of the exemption. This bill would revise these provisions by removing the exemption for separately alienable residential real property and, instead, only exempting a mobilehome if the above-described criteria are met. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2030. This bill would delete the January 1, 2030, repeal date, thereby extending these provisions indefinitely. (3) Notwithstanding the above-described gross rental rate increase prohibition, existing law, upon the expiration of rental restrictions, as defined, authorizes the owner of affordable housing units that meet certain requirements to establish the initial rental rate for the unit, and also authorizes the owner of an assisted housing development who demonstrates compliance with certain requirements under penalty of perjury to establish the initial unassisted rental rate for units in the assisted housing development. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2030. This bill would remove the January 1, 2030, repeal date, thereby extending the initial rental rate authorizations indefinitely. By extending provisions that require the owner of an assisted housing development to demonstrate compliance with specified requirements under penalty of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/27/25 - Amended Assembly AB1157 · 5 edits
MODERATE
AB 1157 makes three major substantive changes to California tenant protection law: it tightens the rent increase cap from the lesser of 5% plus CPI or 10% down to the lesser of 2% plus CPI or 5%; it narrows the exemption for separately alienable residential real property so that only mobilehomes remain exempt (rather than all such properties); and it removes the January 1, 2030 sunset date, making the just-cause eviction and rent cap provisions permanent. The bill also adds county counsel as an authorized enforcer of nuisance provisions related to motion pictures.
Scope change
The bill expands tenant protections by removing the 2030 sunset date (making them permanent), tightening the rent cap, and narrowing the exemption for separately alienable properties so that only mobilehomes remain exempt rather than all such properties. This means more rental units will be subject to just-cause eviction requirements and lower rent increase limits going forward.
REQUIREMENT

The maximum allowable rent increase over any 12-month period is reduced from the lesser of 5% plus the percentage change in cost of living or 10%, to the lesser of 2% plus the percentage change in cost of living or 5%. This significantly limits how much landlords can raise rents annually.

SCOPE

The exemption from just-cause eviction and rent cap rules for residential real property that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit is narrowed. Previously, all such properties (including mobilehomes) could be exempt if the owner met certain criteria and provided written notice. Now only mobilehomes qualify for this exemption.

TIMELINE

The January 1, 2030 repeal date for the just-cause eviction provisions (Section 1946.2), rent cap provisions (Section 1947.12), and initial rental rate authorizations (Section 1947.13) is deleted, making these tenant protections permanent rather than temporary.

ENFORCEMENT

County counsel is added as an authorized official (alongside the district attorney and Attorney General) who can commence an action in equity to abate and prevent nuisance related to the exhibition of motion pictures showing intentional killing or cruelty that actually occurred during production.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee determination changes from no to yes, and the state-mandated local program determination changes from no to yes, reflecting that extending the assisted housing compliance provisions (which require owners to demonstrate compliance under penalty of perjury) imposes a state-mandated program on local agencies.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Jan 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on March 27 corrected.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and A.,E.,S., & T.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors

Sponsors