AB 1023 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Coastal resources: coastal development permits and procedures: Zero Emissions Port Electrification and Operations project.

Summary
Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976, requires any person wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, as defined, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit, as provided. The act further provides for the certification of local coastal programs by the California Coastal Commission. The act provides various procedures related to development control within areas of the coastal zone. This bill would require a coastal development permit associated with the Zero Emissions Port Electrification and Operations project, as defined, to be considered to be within the boundaries of the Los Angeles Harbor District, and would provide the Los Angeles Harbor Department the sole authority to review the permit application and issue an associated coastal development permit on behalf of all jurisdictions ordinarily required to review the application. By placing additional duties on the Los Angeles Harbor District and the Los Angeles Harbor Department regarding the review and approval of coastal development permits for the project, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require any additional development project to install infrastructure or purchase or deploy equipment at a terminal within the boundary of the Port of Los Angeles's Port Master Plan that is not exempt from a coastal development permit to acquire a separate coastal development permit in conformity with the Port of Los Angeles's Port Master Plan. The bill would require the appropriate state agency to render a decision on an application for a permit required for the project, or an additional project associated with the completion of the project, within 90 days of submission of the application and, if no action is taken by the appropriate state agency within that time period, would provide that the permit shall be deemed issued. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Port of Los Angeles. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/20/25 - Introduced 03/24/25 - Amended Assembly · 10 edits · Mar 24, 2025
MAJOR
AB 1023 was transformed from a minor nonsubstantive amendment to California Conservation Corps findings into a major port infrastructure bill. The amended version adds an entirely new Article 3 (Sections 30650-30652) to the Public Resources Code that creates a streamlined permitting process for the Zero Emissions Port Electrification and Operations (ZEPEO) project at the Port of Los Angeles, consolidates coastal development permit authority to the Los Angeles Harbor Department, imposes a 90-day deemed-approval deadline on state agencies, and prohibits fully automated cargo handling equipment from being part of the project.
SCOPE

Entirely new Article 3 (Sections 30650-30652) added to Chapter 7 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code, creating a special statutory framework for the ZEPEO electric grid expansion project at the Port of Los Angeles that adds at least 200 megawatts of power.

Section 30651(b) deems the project compliant with the land use plan of each local jurisdiction once approved by the Los Angeles Harbor Department, effectively overriding local land use controls for this project.

The original bill's sole purpose (nonsubstantive amendment to Conservation Corps findings in Section 14000) is retained but demoted to a secondary provision at the end of the bill, while the primary focus shifts entirely to port electrification infrastructure permitting.

ENFORCEMENT

Section 30651(a) consolidates all coastal development permit review authority for multi-jurisdictional permits related to the project into the Los Angeles Harbor Department, giving it sole authority to issue permits on behalf of all ordinarily required jurisdictions.

REQUIREMENT

Section 30652 imposes a 90-day deadline on state agencies to render a decision on permit applications for the project or associated projects; if no action is taken within that period, the permit is deemed issued (automatic approval).

Section 30651(d) requires any additional development project to install infrastructure or deploy equipment at a terminal within the Port Master Plan boundary that is not exempt from a coastal development permit to obtain a separate permit in conformity with the Port Master Plan.

ELIGIBILITY

Section 30651(c) prohibits the project from including deployment, purchase, or installation of fully automated cargo handling equipment or POLA-owned/tenant-owned infrastructure supporting charging or fueling of such equipment, aligning with existing state law (Section 2192 Streets and Highways Code).

DEFINITION

Section 30650 defines 'project' as ZEPEO, specifying it includes expansion of Receiving Station Q at Harbor Generating Station, expansion of Receiving Station C in Wilmington, construction of a switching station in Wilmington, new distribution lines, and network stations at each container terminal and Outer Harbor. Associated projects like Avalon Promenade and Gateway Project are also covered.

TECHNICAL

New Section 3 declares a special statute is necessary under Article IV, Section 16 of the California Constitution due to the unique need to complete ZEPEO before 2030 and prepare for the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.

FISCAL

Fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' reflecting the new obligations placed on local agencies. Section 4 provides no reimbursement is required because local agencies can levy sufficient service charges, fees, or assessments.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and TRANS.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mike Gipson
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
CA
65