Peace officer training: behavioral health.
Summary
Existing law requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to establish and keep updated a classroom-based continuing training course that includes instructor-led active learning, such as scenario-based training, relating to behavioral health and law enforcement interaction with persons with mental illness, intellectual disability, and substance use disorders. Existing law requires the commission to make available the course to each law enforcement officer with a rank of supervisor or below and who is assigned to patrol duties or to supervise officers who are assigned to patrol duties. This bill would authorize the commission to partner with local departments of behavioral health, community-based organizations, or nonprofit organizations to establish and keep updated this classroom-based continuing training course. The bill would require a law enforcement officer with a rank of supervisor or below and who is assigned to patrol duties or to supervise officers who are assigned to patrol duties to complete the course. By imposing additional training costs on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/20/25 - Introduced
→
AB1013
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects only a difference in document formatting: the first version is a plain-text/PDF-style extraction with line numbers and page markers, while the second is the web-rendered HTML version of the same introduced bill text from the California legislature website.
TECHNICAL
The document was re-rendered from a PDF-style plain text format (with line numbers and page breaks) to a web page format (with navigation elements, search bars, and structured headings). The underlying legal text of AB 1013 is identical in both versions.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1013
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1013. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline