AB 1007 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Land use: development project review.

Summary
Existing law, the Permit Streamlining Act, requires a public agency that is the lead agency for a development project to approve or disapprove a development project within specified time periods. The act requires a public agency that is a responsible agency for specified development projects to approve or disapprove the project within 90 days of the date on which the lead agency has approved the project or within 90 days of the date on which the completed application has been received and accepted as complete by the lead agency, whichever is longer. This bill would reduce the time period that a responsible agency is required to approve or disapprove a project, as described above, from 90 days to 45 days, except as provided. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 20, 2025 Signed Oct 10, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/24/25 - Amended Assembly 08/29/25 - Amended Senate · 5 edits · Aug 29, 2025
MODERATE
The Senate amendment significantly narrowed the bill's scope by removing the entire proposed amendment to Section 65950 (which would have created detailed lead agency review timelines with special 60-day fast-track provisions for affordable housing projects meeting specific criteria). Instead, the Senate version restructures only Section 65952 (responsible agency timelines) into a three-tier system: 180 days for general responsible agencies, 45 days for housing development projects, and 90 days for state commissions handling those same project types. The bill also now acknowledges it imposes a state-mandated local program and requires fiscal committee review.
Scope change
The bill's scope was substantially narrowed. The Assembly version amended both Section 65950 (lead agency timelines) and Section 65952 (responsible agency timelines), with elaborate affordable housing fast-track provisions. The Senate version amends only Section 65952, using a simpler tiered approach that shortens responsible agency deadlines for housing development projects to 45 days while actually extending general responsible agency deadlines to 180 days and creating a middle 90-day tier for state commissions.
SCOPE

The entire proposed amendment to Section 65950 of the Government Code was deleted. This had established detailed lead agency approval timelines, including a special 60-day fast-track for projects where at least 49 percent of units are affordable to very low or low-income households, with requirements for written notice of financing applications and confirmation of those applications before EIR certification.

The bill no longer amends Section 65950 at all, meaning lead agency review timelines remain unchanged from existing law. The bill now only affects responsible agency timelines under Section 65952.

REQUIREMENT

Section 65952 was restructured into a three-tier system. Subdivision (a) sets a general 180-day deadline for responsible agencies (an increase from the current 90 days). Subdivision (b) sets a 45-day deadline for responsible agencies handling housing development projects as defined in existing Section 65950(a)(2) or (3). Subdivision (c) sets a 90-day deadline specifically for the California Coastal Commission and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission when handling those same housing development project types.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating a fiscal impact analysis is now required. The state-mandated local program designation also changed from 'no' to 'yes,' formally acknowledging the bill imposes new duties on local agencies.

DEFINITION

The detailed affordable housing definitions and criteria (49 percent threshold, 30-year rent restrictions, owner-occupied affordability requirements, financing notice requirements) that were part of the removed Section 65950 amendment are no longer in the bill. The 45-day timeline now applies based on the existing definition of housing development projects in current law.

Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2025 · Assembly May 23, 2025

How they voted

400
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 11, 2025
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Oct 10, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3385.).
lower
Sep 12, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2933.).
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 29).
upper
Jul 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 1663.)
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors