Land use: development project review.
What changed between versions
The entire proposed amendment to Section 65950 of the Government Code was deleted. This had established detailed lead agency approval timelines, including a special 60-day fast-track for projects where at least 49 percent of units are affordable to very low or low-income households, with requirements for written notice of financing applications and confirmation of those applications before EIR certification.
The bill no longer amends Section 65950 at all, meaning lead agency review timelines remain unchanged from existing law. The bill now only affects responsible agency timelines under Section 65952.
Section 65952 was restructured into a three-tier system. Subdivision (a) sets a general 180-day deadline for responsible agencies (an increase from the current 90 days). Subdivision (b) sets a 45-day deadline for responsible agencies handling housing development projects as defined in existing Section 65950(a)(2) or (3). Subdivision (c) sets a 90-day deadline specifically for the California Coastal Commission and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission when handling those same housing development project types.
The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating a fiscal impact analysis is now required. The state-mandated local program designation also changed from 'no' to 'yes,' formally acknowledging the bill imposes new duties on local agencies.
The detailed affordable housing definitions and criteria (49 percent threshold, 30-year rent restrictions, owner-occupied affordability requirements, financing notice requirements) that were part of the removed Section 65950 amendment are no longer in the bill. The 45-day timeline now applies based on the existing definition of housing development projects in current law.