AB 1006 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Firearms: concealed carry.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from carrying a concealed firearm or carrying a loaded firearm in public. Existing law requires a licensing authority to issue or renew a license for a person to carry a concealed firearm if specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the applicant is not a disqualified person for the license, as specified, and the applicant is the recorded owner of the firearm with the Department of Justice. Existing law deems an applicant to be a disqualified person and cannot receive or renew a license if, among other reasons, the applicant is reasonably likely to be a danger to self, others, or the community at large, or, in the 10 years prior to the licensing authority receiving the completed application, the applicant has been charged with any certain offense that was dismissed pursuant to a plea or dismissed with a waiver, as specified. Under existing law, any person who files an application knowing that any statement in the application is false is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would also treat the spouse of the recorded owner of the firearm as the recorded owner for licensing purposes. The bill would include additional specified acts that would deem an applicant as a disqualified person, including providing any information that the applicant knew or should have known was inaccurate or incomplete information in connection with the application or, in the 10 years prior to the licensing authority receiving the completed application for a new license or a license renewal, the applicant has been convicted of certain offenses, including knowingly and willingly threatening the life of any elected public official and other specified persons. By expanding the application of an existing crime and expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would make other conforming changes. The bill would make these provisions severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/24/25 - Amended Assembly 04/10/25 - Amended Assembly · 6 edits · Apr 10, 2025
MODERATE
The April 10 amendment makes several substantive changes to California's concealed carry licensing law: it doubles the maximum license duration from 2 years to 4 years, removes a special 3-year provision for judges and court officials, narrows one disqualification ground from mere charges to actual convictions, and adds a knowledge element to the inaccurate-information disqualification. A severability clause was also added.
REQUIREMENT

Maximum license duration increased from 2 years to 4 years in Section 26220(a). This means concealed carry permit holders will need to renew half as often.

SCOPE

The special provision giving judges, court commissioners, federal judges, and magistrates a 3-year license limit (old Section 26220(c)) was deleted entirely. These individuals now fall under the general 4-year maximum like all other licensees.

ELIGIBILITY

The disqualification for providing inaccurate or incomplete information in an application (Section 26202(a)(11)) now requires that the applicant 'knew or should have known' the information was inaccurate or incomplete, rather than applying to any inaccurate or incomplete information regardless of fault.

The disqualification for offenses under Sections 71, 76, 422, or 626.8 (Section 26202(a)(12)) was narrowed from being 'charged with' the offense to being 'convicted of' it. This means a person who was charged but not convicted of these offenses would no longer be automatically disqualified.

TECHNICAL

A severability clause was added as new Section 6, stating that if any provision is held invalid, the remaining provisions continue in effect.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes' and the state-mandated local program designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now imposes costs on local agencies that trigger reimbursement obligations under the California Constitution.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of James Ramos
James Ramos
DDemocratic
CA
45