Workers' compensation: utilization review.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, that generally requires employers to secure the payment of workers' compensation for injuries incurred by their employees that arise out of, and in the course of, employment. Existing law requires every employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process, in compliance with specified requirements, either directly or through its insurer or an entity with which the employer or insurer contracts for these services. Existing law prohibits any person other than a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the medical treatment services from modifying, delaying, or denying requests for authorization of medical treatment for reasons of medical necessity to cure or relieve. This bill would, commencing July 1, 2026, for private employers, require the physician to be licensed by California state law. The bill would make a related intent statement.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Aug 2024
Vetoed
Sep 2024
Introduced Feb 16, 2023
Vetoed Sep 20, 2024
Floor votes · Senate May 22, 2023 · Assembly Aug 29, 2024
How they voted
30–8
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 22, 2023
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
11
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Sep 20, 2024
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 20, 2024
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2024
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 9. Page 5728.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2024
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 29, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 54. Noes 13. Page 6888.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 22, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 24, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 16, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (August 16).
lower
Jun 28, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 21, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
May 26, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
May 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 1221.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 833.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Mar 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 16, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 636
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 636. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline