Tied-house exceptions: advertising: common parent company.
Summary
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, which is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the application, issuance, and suspension of licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages. Existing law, known as tied-house restrictions, generally prohibits specified licensees and their agents from paying a retailer for advertising. Existing law creates a variety of exceptions to this general prohibition. This bill would create a new exception to the tied-house restrictions on advertising. In this regard, the bill would authorize specified licensees to purchase advertising services from an advertising subsidiary that is under common ownership with a retail licensee subsidiary, subject to specified conditions. The bill would require an advertising subsidiary from whom an authorized licensee purchases advertising services pursuant to these provisions to submit to the department semiannually a report that summarizes those services and includes other specified information. The bill would make the solicitation or coercion of a wholesaler or an authorized licensee, as specified, in connection with the advertising services permitted under these provisions a misdemeanor and subject to specified penalties. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would define terms for its purposes and would set forth related findings. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2023
Last action Sep 1, 2023
Floor votes · Senate May 8, 2023
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 8, 2023
D
Democratic31
90% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Sep 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
September 1 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
July 12 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 21, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 20, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (June 14).
lower
May 18, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 8, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1021.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 24, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0. Page 656.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 30, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 22, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 13, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 430
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 430. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline