Firearms: gun violence restraining orders.
Summary
Existing law allows a court to issue a gun violence restraining order prohibiting and enjoining a named person from having custody or control of any firearms or ammunition if the person poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to themselves or another by having custody or control of a firearm or ammunition. Existing law authorizes a court to issue a gun violence restraining order to prohibit a person from purchasing or possessing a firearm or ammunition for a period of one to 5 years, subject to renewal for additional one- to 5-year periods, if the subject of the petition poses a significant danger of self-harm or harm to another in the near future by having a firearm and the order is necessary to prevent personal injury to the subject of the petition or another. Existing law makes it a crime to own or possess a firearm in violation of a gun violence restraining order. If the court finds evidence of an extreme risk of violence, including repeated and egregious instances of specified facts, and those facts existed 12 months prior to a petition being filed, this bill would require a court to issue a gun violence restraining order for 5 years. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2024
Assembly Passage
Jan 2024
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2023
Last action Jun 4, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 25, 2024
How they voted
61–1
Passed · 18 other
Total votes 80
Jan 25, 2024
D
Democratic62
87% Yea
R
Republican18
38% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
1
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Jun 4, 2024
Senate · Reported by committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
May 22, 2024
Senate · Reported by committee
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
May 1, 2024
Senate · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on PUB S.
Jan 25, 2024
Assembly · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 1. Page 3931.)
Jan 18, 2024
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (January 18).
Jan 18, 2024
Assembly · Referred to committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
Jan 9, 2024
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (January 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Jan 4, 2024
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
Jan 3, 2024
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
Mar 28, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Mar 21, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Feb 23, 2023
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
Feb 14, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 667
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 667. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline