AB 2992 California Assembly · 2023-2024 Regular Session

Real Estate Law: buyer-broker representation agreements.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law specifies that a willful violation of the Real Estate Law is a crime. Existing law requires the agreement providing for the amount of compensation to be paid to a real estate licensee for the sale of specified residential property or a mobilehome to contain a statement that the amount or rate of real estate commissions is not fixed by law but rather is set by each broker individually and may be negotiable between the seller and the broker. This bill would require agreements providing for the amount of compensation to be paid to a real estate licensee for the purchase of the specified residential property or a mobilehome to contain the above-described statement. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law imposes limitations on various contracts, including imposing limitations on an exclusive listing agreement regarding single-family residential property. This bill would require that a buyer's agent and a buyer execute a buyer-broker representation agreement as soon as practicable, but no later than the execution of the buyer's offer to purchase real property. The bill would define a buyer-broker representation agreement as a written contract between a buyer and a buyer's agent by which the buyer's agent has been authorized to provide specified services for or on behalf of the buyer under the contract. The bill would require a buyer-broker representation agreement to include specified terms and require that the buyer's agent provide the buyer a specified disclosure prior to execution of the agreement. The bill would prohibit a buyer-broker representation agreement from lasting longer than 3 months from the date the agreement was made, except if the agreement was entered into between a real estate broker and a corporation, limited liability company, or partnership. The bill would prohibit a buyer-broker representation agreement from renewing automatically and would require a renewal of the agreement to be in writing and be dated and signed by all parties to the agreement. The bill would prohibit a buyer-broker representation agreement from lasting longer than 3 months from the date the renewal was made. The bill would make a buyer-broker representation agreement made in violation of these durational and renewal requirements void and unenforceable. The bill would provide that a violation of these provisions by a licensed person under the Real Estate Law is also a violation of the person's licensing law. Because a violation of the bill's provisions by a person licensed under the Real Estate Law is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law provides various duties and obligations owed to a prospective purchaser of real property. Existing law requires a buyer's agent to provide the buyer in a real property transaction with a copy of a certain disclosure form that states that, among other things, the buyer's agent can, with the buyer's consent, agree to act as the agent for the buyer only, as soon as practical before execution of the buyer's officer to purchase. This bill would require the buyer's agent to additionally provide the disclosure form to the buyer as soon as practicable before execution of a buyer-broker representation agreement. The bill would revise the above-described disclosure statement to specify that the buyer's agent includes a buyer's agent under a buyer-broker representation agreement. (4) Under existing law, if an agreement between a principal and an agent in a real property sales transaction contains a provision requiring binding arbitration of any dispute between the principal and agent in the transaction, the agreement is required to display that provision in a specified manner with specified explanatory language. This bill would apply those requirements to a buyer-broker representation agreement. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2024
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2024
Senate Passage
Aug 2024
Signed into Law
Sep 2024
Introduced Feb 16, 2024 Signed Sep 24, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2024 · Assembly May 16, 2024

How they voted

390
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 28, 2024
D Democratic31
31 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
8 Yea 1
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
6
Sep 24, 2024
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2024
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 28, 2024
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 28, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 15).
upper
Aug 5, 2024
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 24, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 12, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 29, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E. D. and JUD.
upper
May 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0.)
lower
May 8, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 25, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 1, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 21, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Stephanie Nguyen
Stephanie Nguyen
DDemocratic
CA
10