Prescription drug labels: accessibility.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and pharmacies by the California State Board of Pharmacy. Existing law requires the board to promulgate regulations that require a standardized, patient-centered, prescription drug label on all prescription medicine dispensed to patients in California. Existing law prohibits a pharmacist from dispensing a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with prescribed information. Existing law makes a violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law requires a dispenser, upon request, to provide translated directions for use, as prescribed. Existing law authorizes a dispenser to use translations made available by the board pursuant to specified regulations of the board and provides that a dispenser is not required to provide translated directions for use beyond the languages that the board has made available or beyond the directions that the board has made available in translated form. Existing law authorizes a dispenser to provide their own translated directions for use to comply with these provisions and prohibits the provisions from being construed to prohibit a dispenser from providing translated directions for use in languages beyond those that the board has made available or beyond the directions that the board has made available in translated form. This bill would also expressly require a dispenser to provide translated directions for use in the languages the board has made available. This bill, except as specified, would require a dispenser, if a person informs a pharmacy that the person identifies as a person who is blind, has low-vision, or is otherwise print disabled, to provide to the person or their authorized representative, at no additional cost, an accessible prescription label affixed to the container that meets prescribed requirements. If the accessible prescription label does not fit on the container, the bill would require the dispenser, upon dispensing the prescription drug, to provide the patient or their authorized representative with a supplemental document that otherwise meets those prescribed requirements. The bill would not apply to prescriptions issued by a veterinarian. The bill would require the board to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the bill. By imposing new requirements on dispensers, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2024
Committee Review
Jul 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2024
Senate Passage
Aug 2024
Signed into Law
Sep 2024
Introduced Jan 23, 2024
Signed Sep 21, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2024 · Assembly May 2, 2024
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Aug 20, 2024
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Sep 21, 2024
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2024
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 0. Page 6427.).
lower
Aug 20, 2024
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 20, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5238.).
upper
Aug 12, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 1, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 17, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 24, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E. D.
upper
May 15, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E. D.
upper
May 2, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5087.)
lower
Apr 24, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 9, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 13, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Mar 12, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 5, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Jan 24, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Co
Megan Dahle
RRepublican
Co
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1902
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1902. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline