California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: residential projects.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts from its requirements a residential project on an urbanized infill site that meets certain requirements, including that the site of the project is not more than 4 acres in total area. This bill would expand the exemption by increasing the size of a residential project that would qualify for the exemption to include a project of not more than 5 acres in total area. The bill would require a lead agency approving an exempt residential project on an urbanized infill site to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research, as specified. Because the bill would increase the number of residential projects that would qualify for the exemption and would require lead agencies to file notices of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research, thereby increasing the duties of a local agency, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2023
Last action Jun 13, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly May 18, 2023
How they voted
74–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 80
May 18, 2023
D
Democratic62
93% Yea
R
Republican18
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
1
Committee
8
Jun 13, 2024
Senate · Reported by committee
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Jun 7, 2023
Senate · Reported by committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
May 31, 2023
Senate · Referred to committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and HOUSING.
May 18, 2023
Assembly · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1596.)
May 10, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 10).
Apr 27, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Apr 18, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
Mar 2, 2023
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. GOV.
Feb 17, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luz Rivas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1318
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1318. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline