SB 775 California Senate · 2021-2022 Regular Session

Felony murder: resentencing.

Summary
Existing law authorizes a person who has been convicted of felony murder or murder under the natural and probable consequences theory to file a petition for the court to vacate the person's sentence and resentence them when specified conditions apply, including that the complaint, information, or indictment was filed against the petitioner that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder or murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine. This bill would expand the authorization to allow a person who was convicted of murder under any theory under which malice is imputed to a person based solely on that person's participation in a crime, attempted murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine, or who was convicted of manslaughter when the prosecution was allowed to proceed on a theory of felony murder or murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine, to apply to have their sentence vacated and be resentenced if, among other things, the complaint, information, or indictment was filed to allow the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder, murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine or other theory under which malice is imputed to a person based solely on that person's participation in a crime, or attempted murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine. Existing law requires the court to review the petition and determine that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the petitioner falls within the resentencing provisions. Existing law requires the court to appoint counsel to represent the petitioner if the petitioner requests counsel. Existing law requires the court to issue an order to show cause if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that they are entitled to relief. This bill would require a court to hold a prima facie hearing to determine whether the petitioner has made a prima facie case for relief. The bill would require the court to appoint counsel, upon the petitioner's request, when receiving a petition in which the required information is set forth or readily ascertainable by the court. The bill would require a court that declines to make an order to show cause to provide a statement fully setting forth its reasons for doing so. Existing law requires the court to hold a hearing to determine if the petitioner is entitled to relief under these provisions. This bill would specify that a finding that there is substantial evidence to support a conviction for murder, attempted murder, or manslaughter is insufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the petitioner is ineligible for resentencing. This bill would authorize a person convicted of murder, attempted murder, or manslaughter whose conviction is not final to challenge the validity of that conviction upon direct appeal.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jul 2021
Senate Passage
Jun 2021
Assembly Passage
Sep 2021
Signed into Law
Oct 2021
Introduced Feb 19, 2021 Signed Oct 5, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2021 · Assembly Sep 11, 2021

How they voted

287
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Jun 2, 2021
D Democratic29
28 Yea 1 Nay
96% Yea
R Republican8
6 Nay 2
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
13
Committee
4
Amendments
8
Oct 5, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2021
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-32-7)
assembly
Sep 10, 2021
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 10. Page 2643.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 10, 2021
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 10, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 41. Noes 32. Page 3160.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 30, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 26, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 26).
lower
Jul 14, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 10, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 1394.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1203.) (May 20).
upper
Apr 14, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 778.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 19, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Josh Becker
Josh Becker
DDemocratic
CA
13