Covenants and restrictions: affordable housing.
Summary
Existing law permits a person who holds an ownership interest of record in property that the person believes is the subject of an unlawfully restrictive covenant based on, among other things, source of income, to record a Restrictive Covenant Modification, which is to include a copy of the original document with the illegal language stricken. Before recording the modification document, existing law requires the county recorder to submit the modification document and the original document to the county counsel who is required to determine whether the original document contains an unlawful restriction. This bill would make any recorded covenants, conditions, restrictions, or limits on the use of private or publicly owned land contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale that restricts the number, size, or location of the residences that may be built on the property, or that restricts the number of persons or families who may reside on the property, unenforceable against the owner of an affordable housing development, as defined, if an approved restrictive covenant affordable housing modification document has been recorded in the public record, as provided, unless a specified exception applies. The bill would authorize the owner of an affordable housing development to submit, among other things, a copy of the original restrictive covenant and a restrictive covenant modification document, pursuant to the above-described provisions of existing law, that modifies or removes any existing restrictive covenant language to the extent necessary to allow an affordable housing development to proceed. Before recording the restrictive covenant modification document, the bill would require the county recorder to submit documentation received from the owner and the modification document to the county counsel, and would require the county counsel to make specified determinations, including whether the original restrictive covenant document contains an unlawful restriction in violation of these provisions and whether the property qualifies as an affordable housing development. The bill would specify that its provisions do not apply to restrictive covenants that relate to purely aesthetic objective design standards, provide for fees or assessments for the maintenance of common areas, or provide for limits on the amount of rent that may be charged to tenants. The bill would also specify that its provisions do not apply to conservation easements that meet certain conditions, a recorded interest in land comparable to a conservation easement held by a political subdivision, or any settlement, conservation agreement, or conservation easement for which certain conditions apply. The bill would also specify that its provisions do not apply to any recorded deed restriction, public access easement, or other similar covenant that was required by a state agency for the purpose of compliance with a state or federal law under certain circumstances. This bill would declare that ensuring access to affordable and supportive housing and the production of additional affordable and supportive housing is a matter of statewide concern, not a municipal affair, and that this bill shall therefore apply statewide to all cities and counties, including charter cities, and to all conditions, covenants, restrictions, or limits on the use of land, whether recorded previous to the effective date of this bill or recorded at any time thereafter. By imposing additional duties on counties with regard to recorded covenants, the bill would impose a state-mandated program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2021
Assembly Passage
Jun 2021
Senate Passage
Sep 2021
Signed into Law
Sep 2021
Introduced Feb 16, 2021
Signed Sep 28, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Sep 1, 2021 · Assembly Jun 2, 2021
How they voted
29–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Sep 1, 2021
D
Democratic31
93% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
12
Sep 28, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 2732.).
lower
Sep 1, 2021
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 1, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 2309.).
upper
Aug 26, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 26).
upper
Aug 23, 2021
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Aug 16, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 16, 2021
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 14, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (July 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 5, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jul 1, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 23, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.
upper
Jun 16, 2021
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HOUSING and JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 18. Page 1845.)
lower
May 24, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 20, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 20).
lower
May 19, 2021
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 21, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 19, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Feb 25, 2021
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 721
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 721. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline