Peace officers: use of force.
Summary
Existing law requires each law enforcement agency, on or before January 1, 2021, to maintain a policy that provides a minimum standard on the use of force. Existing law requires that policy, among other things, to require that officers report potential excessive force to a superior officer when present and observing another officer using force that the officer believes to be unnecessary, and to require that officers intercede when present and observing another officer using force that is clearly beyond that which is necessary, as specified. This bill would require those law enforcement policies to require those officers to immediately report potential excessive force, as defined. The bill would additionally require those policies to, among other things, prohibit retaliation against officers that report violations of law or regulation of another officer to a supervisor, as specified, and to require that an officer who fails to intercede be disciplined up to and including in the same manner as the officer who used excessive force. By imposing additional duties on local agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2021
Assembly Passage
Jun 2021
Senate Passage
Aug 2021
Signed into Law
Sep 2021
Introduced Dec 7, 2020
Signed Sep 30, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2021 · Assembly Jun 1, 2021
How they voted
25–8
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 30, 2021
D
Democratic29
86% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Sep 30, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 2626.).
lower
Aug 31, 2021
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 9. Page 2234.).
upper
Aug 26, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 26).
upper
Aug 23, 2021
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 7, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 30, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 1720.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 18. Page 1747.)
lower
May 27, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1639.)
lower
May 24, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 20, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 20).
lower
Apr 14, 2021
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 26, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (March 23).
lower
Jan 11, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 8, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 26
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 26. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline