Sales and use tax: exemptions: manufacturing.
Summary
Existing sales and use tax laws impose taxes on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. The Sales and Use Tax Law provides various exemptions from those taxes, including a partial exemption from those taxes, on and after July 1, 2014, and before July 1, 2030, for the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for purchases not exceeding $200,000,000, for use primarily in manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of tangible personal property, as specified; qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily in research and development, as provided; qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily to maintain, repair, measure, or test any qualified tangible personal property, as provided; and qualified tangible personal property purchased by a contractor purchasing that property for use in the performance of a construction contract for the qualified person, that will use that property as an integral part of specified processes. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2018, and before July 1, 2030, additionally exempts from those taxes the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily in the generation or production, as defined, or storage and distribution, as defined, of electric power. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2028, make this a full exemption for purchases not exceeding $200,000,000. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2028, and would revert to the above-described partial exemption on that date. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would require the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to submit a report to the Legislature on the exemption and would provide findings and declarations relating to the goals of the exemption. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Vetoed
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 10, 2022
Vetoed Sep 15, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2022 · Assembly May 26, 2022
How they voted
29–3
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Aug 25, 2022
D
Democratic29
86% Yea
R
Republican8
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Sep 15, 2022
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 25, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 25, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 3. Page 5122.).
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 8, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Aug 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 8, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 26, 2022
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-4)
assembly
May 25, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5032.)
lower
May 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 19, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 19).
lower
May 18, 2022
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 26, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
lower
Feb 18, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Co
CV
Carlos Villapudua
DDemocratic
Co
Cottie Petrie-Norris
DDemocratic
Co
James Ramos
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jim Wood
DDemocratic
Co
Ken Cooley
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Co
Rudy Salas, Jr.
DDemocratic
Co
Sharon Quirk-Silva
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1951
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1951. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline