Employees: bereavement leave.
Summary
Existing law, commonly known as the California Family Rights Act, which is a part of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer, as defined, to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period for family care and medical leave, as specified. This bill would additionally make it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 5 days of bereavement leave upon the death of a family member, as defined. The bill would require that leave be completed within 3 months of the date of death. The bill would require that leave be taken pursuant to any existing bereavement leave policy of the employer. Under the bill, in the absence of an existing policy, the bereavement leave may be unpaid. However, the bill would authorize an employee to use certain other leave balances otherwise available to the employee, including accrued and available paid sick leave. This bill would require, if an existing leave policy provides for less than 5 days of bereavement leave, a total of at least 5 days of bereavement leave for the employee, as prescribed. The bill would make it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to engage in specified acts of discrimination, interference, or retaliation relating to an individual's exercise of rights under the bill. The bill would require the employer to maintain employee confidentiality relating to bereavement leave, as specified. The bill would not apply to an employee who is covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement that provides for prescribed bereavement leave and other specified working conditions. Existing law requires the Department of Fair Employment and Housing to create a small employer family leave mediation pilot program for alleged violations of specified family care and medical leave provisions, applicable to employers with between 5 and 19 employees. This bill would require the Department of Fair Employment and Housing to expand the program to include mediation for alleged violations of these provisions. Existing law grants specified permanent employees of the state up to 3 days of bereavement leave, with up to 2 additional days of bereavement leave upon request if the death is out of state. Existing law specifies that these 2 additional days are to be without pay or are to be charged against existing sick leave credits. This bill would recast those provisions to specify that the first 3 days of bereavement leave are to be paid leave, and to remove the condition that the death be out of state for the additional 2 days. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 10, 2022
Signed Sep 29, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2022 · Assembly May 26, 2022
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
Aug 29, 2022
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
44% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
7
Sep 29, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 9.).
lower
Aug 29, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 5179.).
upper
Aug 16, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 2, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 22, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L., P.E. & R. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 8, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 26, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 9.)
lower
May 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 19).
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Mar 31, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 30, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 29).
lower
Mar 17, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (March 16). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
Feb 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1949
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1949. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline