Public resources.
Summary
(1) Existing law defines land as a material of earth and includes free or occupied space for an indefinite upward or downward distance for the purpose of prescribing ownership of land. This bill would specify that free space includes pore space that can be possessed and used for the storage of gaseous or liquid substances. (2) Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal exercises safety regulatory jurisdiction over intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of hazardous or highly volatile liquid substances. The act imposes various requirements in relation to the regulation of these intrastate pipelines and requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations, not later than June 30, 1991, that establish procedures for maintaining, testing, and inspecting mainline valves and check valves on intrastate hazardous liquid pipelines. A person who willfully and knowingly violates the act or a regulation issued pursuant to the act is, upon conviction, subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both a fine and imprisonment, as provided. This bill would expand the regulation of intrastate pipelines under the act to intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide, as defined, including by revising the definition of "pipeline" for purposes of the act to also include intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide. The bill would exempt from the act intrastate gas pipelines regulated by the Public Utilities Commission. The bill would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations, not later than January 1, 2023, that establish procedures for maintaining, testing, and inspecting mainline valves and check valves on intrastate hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines. By imposing additional requirements under the act, and requiring the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations, relating to intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide, a violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes. (3) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires a lead agency to consult with a responsible agency, which is a public agency, other than the lead agency, that has responsibilities in carrying out or approving a project, in conducting the lead agency's environmental review. This bill would designate the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission as the lead agency and specified state agencies as responsible agencies for carbon capture and storage projects under CEQA. The bill would require the commission to coordinate the development of performance standards for carbon capture and storage sites, as prescribed. (4) Existing law, enacted as part of the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015, requires the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) , in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and the State Air Resources Board (state board) , to direct electrical corporations to file applications for programs and investments to accelerate widespread transportation electrification, as defined, to achieve specified results. The PUC is required to approve, or modify and approve, programs and investments in transportation electrification, including those that deploy charging infrastructure, through a reasonable cost recovery mechanism, if they meet specified requirements. This bill would require the PUC, in consultation with the state board and the Energy Commission, to authorize gas corporations to file applications for investments in programs to accelerate the use of carbon capture and sequestration or utilization to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases consistent with state carbon reduction goals. The bill would require the PUC to approve, or modify and approve, programs and investments in carbon pipelines, and carbon capture-related infrastructure and storage, through a reasonable cost recovery mechanism. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2021
Assembly Passage
Jun 2021
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2021
Last action Aug 19, 2021
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2021
How they voted
79–0
Passed
Total votes 79
Jun 1, 2021
D
Democratic59
100% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Aug 19, 2021
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 15, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 6, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1736.)
lower
May 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 20).
lower
May 12, 2021
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 27, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 26, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 12, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on U. & E. and NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 22, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 18, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2021
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & E.
lower
Feb 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Patrick O'Donnell
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1531
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1531. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline