California Environmental Quality Act: small disadvantaged community water system: state small water system: exemption.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration, as specified, if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA includes exemptions from its environmental review requirements for numerous categories of projects, as prescribed. This bill would, with certain specified exceptions, exempt from CEQA certain projects consisting solely of the installation, repair, or reconstruction of water infrastructure, as specified, that primarily benefits a small disadvantaged community water system, as defined, or a state small water system, as defined, by improving the small disadvantaged community water system's or state small water system's water quality, water supply, or water supply reliability, by encouraging water conservation, or by providing drinking water service to existing residences within a disadvantaged community, a small disadvantaged community water system, or a state small water system where there is evidence that the water exceeds maximum contaminant levels for primary or secondary drinking water standards or where the drinking water well is no longer able to produce an adequate supply of safe drinking water. To qualify for this CEQA exemption, the bill would require these projects to meet certain labor requirements and certain conditions, including fully mitigating all construction impacts and not affecting wetlands or sensitive habitat. The bill would also define various terms for purposes of this exemption. The bill would require the lead agency, before determining a project is exempt under these provisions, to contact the State Water Resources Control Board to determine whether claiming the exemption will affect the ability of the small disadvantaged community water system or the state small water system from receiving federal financial assistance or federally capitalized financial assistance. If the lead agency approves or carries out a project that is exempt from CEQA by the above provisions, the bill would require the lead agency to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk of the county in which the project is located, as provided. Because a lead agency would be required to file the notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would repeal this exemption on January 1, 2028. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Senate Passage
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Aug 2020
Signed into Law
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 11, 2020
Signed Sep 28, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jun 26, 2020 · Assembly Aug 31, 2020
How they voted
29–5
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 26, 2020
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican9
55% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
14
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Sep 28, 2020
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2020
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-3-5)
assembly
Aug 31, 2020
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 3.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2020
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 3. Page 5289.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 25, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 20, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 19, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 18).
lower
Aug 12, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (August 6).
lower
Jul 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
July 29 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 29, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 26, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 6. Page 3882.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jun 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Jun 8, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 29, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3621.) (May 29).
upper
Mar 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
April 1 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 20, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Feb 11, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Melissa Hurtado
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Co
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 974
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 974. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline