Peace officers: release of records.
Summary
(1) Existing law makes peace officer and custodial officer personnel records and specified records maintained by any state or local agency, or information obtained from these records, confidential and prohibits these records from being disclosed in any criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery. Existing law sets forth exceptions to this policy, including, among others, records relating to specified incidents involving the discharge of a firearm, sexual assault, perjury, or misconduct by a peace officer or custodial officer. Existing law makes a record related to an incident involving the use of force against a person resulting in death or great bodily injury subject to disclosure. Existing law requires a state or local agency to make these excepted records available for inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act. This bill would, commencing July 1, 2021, make every incident involving use of force to make a member of the public comply with an officer, force that is unreasonable, or excessive force subject to disclosure. The bill would, commencing July 1, 2021, require records relating to sustained findings of unlawful arrests and unlawful searches to be subject to disclosure. The bill would, commencing July 1, 2021, also require the disclosure of records relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made by any law enforcement agency or oversight agency that a peace officer or custodial officer engaged in conduct involving prejudice or discrimination on the basis of specified protected classes. The bill would require the retention of all complaints currently in the possession of a department or agency for a period of at least 30 years if they are related to a sustained finding of specified conduct. The bill would require that records relating to an incident in which an officer resigned before an investigation is completed to also be subject to release. The bill would require records subject to disclosure to be provided at the earliest possible time and no later than 45 days from the date of a request for their disclosure, except as specified. The bill would impose a civil fine not to exceed $1,000 per day for each day beyond 30 days that records subject to disclosure are not disclosed. The bill would entitle a member of the public who successfully files suit for the release of records to twice the party's reasonable costs and attorney's fees. By imposing additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law authorizes an agency to delay the release of a record involving the discharge of a firearm or the use of force during an active criminal investigation, as provided. This bill would expand the authorization to delay the release of records during an investigation to include records of incidents involving sexual assault and dishonesty by officers, and the records of incidents involving prejudice or discrimination, wrongful arrests, and wrongful searches that are required to be made public by this bill. (3) Existing law requires a court, in determining the relevance of evidence, to exclude from trial any information consisting of complaints concerning peace officer conduct that is more than 5 years older than the subject of the litigation. This bill would delete that provision. (4) Existing law requires an agency or department employing peace officers to make a record of any investigations of misconduct. Existing law requires a peace officer seeking employment with a department or agency to give written permission to the hiring agency or department to view that file. This bill would require each department or agency to request and review that file prior to hiring a peace officer. The bill would also require every person employed as a peace officer to immediately report all uses of force by the officer to the officer's department or agency. By imposing additional duties on local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1045 of the Evidence Code proposed by SB 1220 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1220 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 832.7 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 731 to be operative only if this bill and SB 731 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Senate Passage
Jan 2020
Assembly Passage
Aug 2020
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Sep 1, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jan 27, 2020 · Assembly Sep 1, 2020
How they voted
27–5
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Jan 27, 2020
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican8
62% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
11
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Sep 1, 2020
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-14-11)
assembly
Aug 31, 2020
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 31, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 53. Noes 15. Page 5506.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 25, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 24, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 20, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 6.) (August 20).
lower
Aug 6, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (August 5).
lower
Jul 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
August 3 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 29, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 27, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 6. Page 3150.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jan 21, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jan 15, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3098.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 6, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 776
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 776. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline