Very high fire hazard severity zone: state responsibility area: development prohibition.
Summary
Existing law requires the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection to identify areas of the state as very high fire hazard severity zones based on specified criteria. Existing law requires a local agency to designate, by ordinance, very high hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the director. Existing law authorizes a local agency to include areas within its jurisdiction not identified as very high fire hazard severity zones by the director as very high fire hazard severity zones following a specified finding supported by substantial evidence. Existing law requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to determine, based on specified criteria, whether an area of the state is one for which the financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires is primarily the responsibility of the state. Existing law refers to these areas as "state responsibility areas." This bill would, in furtherance of specified state housing production and wildfire mitigation goals, prohibit the creation or approval of a new development, as defined, in a very high fire hazard severity zone or a state responsibility area. By imposing new duties on local governments with respect to the approval of new developments in very high fire hazard severity zones and state responsibility areas, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Last action Jun 29, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2019
How they voted
31–2
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 28, 2019
D
Democratic27
96% Yea
R
Republican8
62% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jun 29, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 26, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
May 28, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 1327.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 21, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 20, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1100.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 777.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 21, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 474
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 474. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline