Water conservation: water losses: enforcement.
Summary
Existing law requires each urban retail water supplier to calculate an urban water use objective no later than November 1, 2023, and by November 1 every year thereafter. Existing law requires the urban water use objective to be composed of the sum of certain water use estimates, including aggregate estimated efficient water losses. Existing law authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to issue information orders, written notices, and conservation orders to an urban retail water supplier that does not meet its urban water use objective, as specified. Existing law requires the board, no earlier than January 1, 2019, and no later than July 1, 2020, to adopt rules requiring urban retail water suppliers to meet performance standards for the volume of water losses. This bill would prohibit the board from issuing an information order, written notice, or conservation order to an urban retail water supplier that does not meet its urban water use objective if the board determines the urban retail water supplier is not meeting its urban water use objective solely because the volume of water loss exceeds the urban retail water supplier's standard for water loss and the board is taking enforcement action against the urban retail water supplier for not meeting the performance standards for the volume of water losses.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Aug 2019
Introduced Jan 15, 2019
Signed Aug 30, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 13, 2019 · Assembly Aug 19, 2019
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 13, 2019
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Aug 30, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2755.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 14, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 14).
lower
Jun 18, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 30, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
May 13, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1033.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 8, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 622.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 24, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jan 15, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 134
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 134. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline