SB 1220 California Senate · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Peace and custodial officers.

Summary
Existing law requires each department or agency in this state that employs peace officers to establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against the personnel of these departments or agencies, and to make a written description of the procedure available to the public. Existing law generally makes the personnel records of peace officers and custodial officers and records maintained by a state or local agency pursuant to these requirements, or information obtained from these records, confidential and exempt from disclosure in a criminal or civil proceeding. Existing law provides discovery procedures for peace or custodial officer personnel records, and other records pertaining to peace or custodial officers, as specified. Existing law defines a Brady list as a system, index, list, or other record containing the names of peace officers whose personnel files are likely to contain evidence of dishonesty or bias, as specified. This bill would require each prosecuting agency to maintain a Brady list. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2022, require any state or local law enforcement agency maintaining personnel records of peace officers and custodial officers to annually, to each prosecuting agency within its jurisdiction, and upon request to any prosecuting agency, provide a list of names and badge numbers of officers employed by the agency in the 5 years prior to providing the list who meet specified criteria, including, among other things, that the officer has had sustained findings for conduct of moral turpitude or group bias or that the officer is on probation for a criminal offense. The bill would require the prosecuting agency to keep this list confidential, except as constitutionally required. The bill would additionally require a prosecuting agency, prior to placing an officer's name on a Brady list, to notify the officer as soon as practicable and provide the officer an opportunity to present information to the prosecuting agency against the officer's placement on the list, except as specified. By imposing new duties on prosecuting agencies and local law enforcement agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1045 of the Evidence Code proposed by SB 776 to be operative only if this bill and SB 776 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Senate Passage
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Aug 2020
Vetoed
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 20, 2020 Vetoed Sep 30, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jun 26, 2020 · Assembly Aug 31, 2020

How they voted

290
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 35
Jun 26, 2020
D Democratic26
22 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican9
7 Yea 2
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
12
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2020
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 30, 2020
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2020
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-12)
assembly
Aug 31, 2020
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 1.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2020
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 5285.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 26, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 20, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 20).
lower
Aug 6, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
August 3 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 29, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 26, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 3876.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jun 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3770.) (June 18).
upper
May 27, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (May 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 14, 2020
Upper · Passed
May 20 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 11, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 5, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 20, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Tom Umberg
Tom Umberg
DDemocratic
CA
34