Emergency backup generators: critical facilities: exemptions.
Summary
Existing law imposes various limitations on emissions of air contaminants for the control of air pollution from vehicular and nonvehicular sources. Existing law generally designates air pollution control and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to identify toxic air contaminants that are emitted into the ambient air of the state and to establish airborne toxic control measures to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants from nonvehicular sources. This bill would require an air district without a specified rule on emergency backup generators, as defined, as of January 1, 2021, that adopts such a rule to include in the rule provisions that allow the operator of a critical facility, as defined, to use a permitted emergency backup generator in exceedance of the applicable runtime and testing and maintenance limits if specified conditions are met. The bill would require a critical facility allowed to exceed applicable limits under a rule adopted pursuant to that provision to attest to and provide evidence of having taken demonstrable steps toward implementing the use of backup power technologies that meet or exceed emission standards set by the state board. By adding to the duties of air districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2020
Last action Jul 27, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jun 25, 2020
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Jun 25, 2020
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Jun 29, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 25, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 3838.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jun 8, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 29, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3622.) (May 29).
upper
Mar 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
April 1 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 27, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Feb 19, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Co
John M. W. Moorlach
RRepublican
Co
Steve Glazer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1099
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1099. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline