Self-service storage facilities.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Self-Service Storage Facility Act, specifies remedies and procedures for self-service storage facility owners when occupants are delinquent in paying rent or other charges. Under existing law, if rent or other charges due from an occupant remain unpaid for 14 consecutive days, an owner may terminate the right of the occupant to the use of the storage space at a self-service storage facility by sending a preliminary lien notice by certified mail to the occupant's last known address, as defined to mean the address provided by the occupant, as specified. Existing law, until January 1, 2021, authorizes the notice to be sent by electronic mail subject to specified conditions. Existing law also allows an owner to demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of documents by, among other methods, the occupant acknowledging receipt of the electronic transmission of the notice by executing an electronic signature or by transmitting the notice to the occupant through an application on a personal electronic device, as provided. This bill would remove the January 1, 2021, date, thus authorizing the sending of the notice by electronic mail indefinitely. The bill would allow an owner to demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of documents by transmitting the document to the occupant through an application on an internet website, rather than an application on a personal electronic device, or by the occupant acknowledging receipt by replying to the electronic mail communication, and would make conforming changes. The bill would make the provision allowing an owner to demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of documents by email communication inoperative on January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, until January 1, 2021, deems a lien to attach if the notice has been sent and the total sum due has not been paid by the specified termination date. Existing law requires the owner to send to the occupant's last known address a notice of lien sale and a blank declaration in opposition to the lien sale. This bill would remove the January 1, 2021, date.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 30, 2019
Last action Jun 23, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2020
How they voted
75–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 79
Jan 27, 2020
D
Democratic60
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican18
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 3908.)
lower
Jan 21, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jan 17, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (January 14).
lower
Jan 14, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Jan 7, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 20, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 28, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P.
lower
Jan 31, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
James Ramos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 325
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 325. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline