AB 1864 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Financial institutions: regulation: Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Business Oversight in the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency, headed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. Under existing law, the department has charge of the execution of specified laws relating to various financial institutions and financial services, including banks, trust companies, credit unions, finance lenders, and residential mortgage lenders. This bill would rename the "Department of Business Oversight" as the "Department of Financial Protection and Innovation," which would be charged with execution of the above-specified laws. The bill would also put this department in charge of various other laws relating to providing financial products and services in this state. The bill would rename the commissioner of the department as the "Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation." The bill would specify that upon the operative date of its provisions, the powers, duties, responsibilities, and functions of the former Commissioner of Business Oversight and the Department of Business Oversight would become those of the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation (commissioner) and the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (department) , respectively. The bill would require the commissioner and department to retain all of the rights, properties, debts, and liabilities of the former commissioner and department and would specify that the change of name does not affect the validity of actions, proceedings, permits, or other actions taken previously. This bill would enact the California Consumer Financial Protection Law (CCFPL) to strengthen consumer protections by expanding the ability of the department to improve accountability and transparency in the California financial system and promote nondiscriminatory access to responsible, affordable credit, among other purposes. The bill would require the department to regulate the provision of various consumer financial products or services and to exercise nonexclusive oversight and enforcement authority under California consumer financial laws and, to the extent permissible, under the federal consumer financial laws. The bill would make it unlawful for covered persons or service providers, as defined, to, among other acts, engage in unlawful, unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices with respect to consumer financial products or services, or offer or provide a consumer a financial product or service that is not in conformity with any consumer financial law. The bill would grant the department, among other duties, the power to bring administrative and civil actions, issue subpoenas, promulgate regulations, hold hearings, issue publications, conduct investigations, and implement outreach and education programs. The bill would also require the department to promulgate specified regulations and to promulgate rules regarding registration requirements applicable to a covered person within certain timeframes and subject to specified conditions. The bill would require the Legislature to conduct public hearings to obtain input on feasibility, and would require the commissioner to annually appear before and present information on enforcement actions and various other activities under the CCFPL to the appropriate legislative committees. The bill would further require the department to establish the Financial Technology Innovation Office, as specified. This bill would require all moneys collected or received by the commissioner under the CCFPL to be deposited with the State Treasurer to the credit of the Financial Protection Fund, which the bill would create, for the administration of the CCFPL. Moneys in those funds would consist of fees, fines, penalties, and other moneys received. All moneys in the fund would be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of the CCFPL. The bill would authorize the department to set and collect a reasonable annual registration fee for each entity required to register under this law and to take action against persons who engage in unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices with respect to consumer financial products or services. The bill would require covered persons and service providers to file certain documents, under oath, with the department. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also impose specific civil and monetary penalties for violations of the CCFPL, as well as injunctive relief. The bill would require administrative procedures under the act to be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and would authorize the department to enter into agreements with the Attorney General regarding coordinating civil and investigatory actions among these agencies. The bill would also require the commissioner to prepare and publish on its internet website an annual report containing specified information. (2) Existing law generally prohibits state agencies from employing in-house counsel to act on behalf of the agency or its employees in judicial or administrative adjudicative proceedings but exempts specified agencies from this provision, including the Regents of the University of California and the Trustees of the California State University. This bill would exempt the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation from that provision. (3) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Aug 2020
Signed into Law
Sep 2020
Introduced Jan 7, 2020 Signed Sep 25, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2020 · Assembly Jun 15, 2020

How they voted

259
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Aug 31, 2020
D Democratic26
25 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican9
9 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2020
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2020
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 5482.).
lower
Aug 31, 2020
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 31, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 10.).
upper
Aug 29, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 27, 2020
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 1, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Jun 15, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 14. Page 4862.)
lower
Feb 26, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 17, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 8, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Monique Limón
DDemocratic
CA
21