AB 1599 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Peace officers: investigations of misconduct.

Summary
Existing law requires a department or agency that employs peace officers to establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against those officers. Existing law authorizes a department or agency that employs custodial officers to establish a similar procedure for its officers. Existing law requires the department or agency to provide written notification to the complaining party of the disposition of a complaint made pursuant to those provisions within 30 days of the disposition. Existing law also makes the investigation records for specified complaints subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. This bill would require a law enforcement agency or oversight agency to complete its investigation into an allegation of the use of force resulting in death or great bodily injury, sexual assault, discharge of a firearm, or dishonesty relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime or misconduct by another peace officer or custodial officer, despite the peace officer's or custodial officer's voluntary separation from the employing agency. The bill would require the investigation to result in a finding that the allegation is either sustained, not sustained, unfounded, or exonerated, as defined. The bill would also require an agency other than an officer's employing agency that conducts an investigation of these allegations to disclose its findings with the employing agency no later than the conclusion of the investigation. By imposing additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Assembly Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019 Last action Aug 20, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2020

How they voted

572
Passed · 14 other
Total votes 73
Jan 27, 2020
D Democratic55
48 Yea 2 Nay 5
87% Yea
I Independent1
1
0% Nay
R Republican17
9 Yea 8
52% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
17
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Aug 20, 2020
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 13, 2020
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 1, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 31). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 2. Page 3899.)
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 23).
lower
Jan 14, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 7, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jordan Cunningham
Jordan Cunningham
RRepublican
CA
35