Social media: the Parent's Accountability and Child Protection Act.
Summary
Existing federal law requires an operator of an internet website or online service directed to a child, as defined, or an operator of an internet website or online service that has actual knowledge that it is collecting personal information from a child, to provide notice of what information is being collected and how that information is being used, and to give the parents of the child the opportunity to refuse to permit the operator's further collection of information from the child. Existing law, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, prohibits a business from selling the personal information, as defined, of a consumer without first obtaining the authorization of the consumer's parent or guardian, if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age. Existing state law prohibits an operator of an internet website, online service, online application, or mobile application, as specified, from marketing or advertising specified types of products or services to a minor. Existing law, known as the Parent's Accountability and Child Protection Act, commencing on January 1, 2020, requires a person or business that conducts business in California and that seeks to sell specified products or services to take reasonable steps, as specified, to ensure that the purchaser is of legal age at the time of purchase or delivery, including, but not limited to, verifying the age of the purchaser. This bill, on and after July 1, 2021, would prohibit a person or business that conducts business in California, and that operates a social media website or application, as defined, from allowing a person who the business actually knows is under 13 years of age to create an account with the website or application unless the website or application obtains the consent of the person's parent or guardian before creating the account using a method that includes reasonable measures to ensure that the person giving their consent is the parent or legal guardian of the person under 13 years of age. The bill would deem a business to have actual knowledge of a consumer's age if it willfully disregards the consumer's age. The bill would authorize a person or business to require the person who is giving their consent for creation of the account to do various things, including signing a consent form and sending it to the person or business via fax, United States mail, or electronic scan; providing credit card, debit card, or other online payment system information that will provide the parent or guardian notification of each separate transaction made using the account; or calling a toll-free telephone number staffed by personnel who are trained to ensure that the person authorizing creation of the account is the legal guardian of the minor, as specified. The bill would prohibit information provided to a social media company for parental consent from being retained or used by the company, except as may be necessary for the purposes of this bill.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Vetoed Sep 29, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2019 · Assembly May 23, 2019
How they voted
25–4
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 34
Sep 12, 2019
D
Democratic26
65% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Sep 29, 2020
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 4. Page 5371.).
lower
Sep 14, 2019
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 12. Page 3616.)
lower
Sep 12, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 4. Page 2895.).
upper
Sep 5, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 9).
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 6. Page 1853.)
lower
May 13, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1614.)
lower
May 6, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 22, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 26, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 25, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
Chad Mayes
IIndependent
Co
Jordan Cunningham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1138
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1138. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline