Juveniles: fitness for juvenile court.
Summary
Existing law, the Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016, as enacted by Proposition 57 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, allows the district attorney to make a motion to transfer a minor from juvenile court to a court of criminal jurisdiction in a case in which a minor is alleged to have committed a felony when he or she was 16 years of age or older or in a case in which a specified serious offense is alleged to have been committed by a minor when he or she was 14 or 15 years of age. The existing Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016 may be amended by a majority vote of the members of each house of the Legislature if the amendments are consistent with and further the intent of the act. This bill would repeal the authority of a district attorney to make a motion to transfer a minor from juvenile court to a court of criminal jurisdiction in a case in which a minor is alleged to have committed a specified serious offense when he or she was 14 or 15 years of age, unless the individual was not apprehended prior to the end of juvenile court jurisdiction, thereby amending Proposition 57. By increasing the number of minors retained under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that its provisions are consistent with and further the intent of Proposition 57.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 16, 2018
Signed Sep 30, 2018
Floor votes · Assembly Aug 30, 2018
How they voted
38–19
Passed · 13 other
Total votes 70
Aug 30, 2018
D
Democratic48
77% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican21
85% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-19-13)
assembly
Aug 30, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 6034.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 29, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 16, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Jun 26, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 11, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4309.) (May 25).
upper
Apr 3, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 4516.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 16, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1391
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1391. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline