California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, grants, commencing on January 1, 2020, a consumer various rights with regard to personal information relating to that consumer that is held by a business, including the right to request a business to delete any personal information about the consumer collected by the business, and requires the business to comply with a verifiable consumer request to that effect, unless it is necessary for the business or service provider to maintain the customer's personal information in order to carry out specified acts. The act requires a business that collects personal information about a consumer to disclose the consumer's right to delete personal information described above on its Internet Web site or in its online privacy policy or policies. This bill would modify that requirement by requiring a business that collects personal information about a consumer to disclose the consumer's right to delete personal information in a form that is reasonably accessible to consumers and in accordance with a specified process. (2) The act establishes several exceptions to the requirements imposed, and rights granted, by the act, including prohibiting the act from being interpreted to restrict the ability of a business to comply with federal, state, or local laws, and by providing that the act does not apply if it is in conflict with the California Constitution. This bill would provide that the rights afforded to consumers and the obligations imposed on any business under the act does not apply if those rights or obligations would infringe on the noncommercial activities of people and entities described in a specified provision of the California Constitution addressing activities related to newspapers and periodicals. The bill would also prohibit application of the act to personal information collected, processed, sold, or disclosed pursuant to a specified federal law relating to banks, brokerages, insurance companies, and credit reporting agencies, among others, and would also except application of the act to that information pursuant to the California Financial Information Privacy Act. The bill would provide that these exceptions, and the exception provided to information collected, processed, sold, or disclosed pursuant to the Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994, do not apply to specific provisions of the act related to unauthorized theft and disclosure of information. The bill would revise and expand the exception provided for medical information, would except a provider of health care or a covered entity, and would also except information collected as part of clinical trials, as specified. The bill would also clarify that the act does not apply if it is in conflict with the United States Constitution. (3) The act generally provides for its enforcement by the Attorney General, but also provides for a private right of action in connection with certain unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft, or disclosure of a consumer's nonencrypted or nonredacted personal information, as defined for this purpose, provided that the consumer bringing an action notify the Attorney General of the action in accordance with a specified process. The act provides that a business, service provider, or other person who violates its provisions, and fails to cure those violations within 30 days, is liable for a civil penalty under laws relating to unfair competition in an action to be brought by the Attorney General. The act prescribes a formula for allocating civil penalties and settlements assessed in these actions with 80% to be allocated to the jurisdictions of the behalf of which the action was brought. This bill would clarify that the only private right of action permitted under the act is the private right of action described above for violations of unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft, or disclosure of a consumer's nonencrypted or nonredacted personal information and would delete the requirement that a consumer bringing a private right of action notify the Attorney General. The bill would remove references to laws relating to unfair competition in connection with Attorney General actions described above. The bill would limit the civil penalty to be assessed in an Attorney General action in this context to not more than $2,500 per violation or $7,500 per each intentional violation and would specify that an injunction is also available as remedy. The bill would eliminate the formula for allocating penalties and settlements and would instead provide that all of these moneys be deposited in the Consumer Privacy Fund with the intent to offset costs incurred by the courts and the Attorney General in connection with the act. The bill would also revise timelines and requirements regarding the promulgation of regulations by the Attorney General in connection with the act. (4) The act makes its provisions operative on January 1, 2020, provided a specified contingency is satisfied. Provisions of the act supersede and preempt laws adopted by local entities regarding the collection and sale of a consumer's personal information by a business. This bill would make the provisions of the act that supersede and preempt laws adopted by local entities, as described above, operative on the date the bill becomes effective. (5) This bill would also make various technical and clarifying changes to the act. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
Aug 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 13, 2018
Signed Sep 23, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2018 · Assembly Sep 1, 2018
How they voted
32–0
Passed
Total votes 32
Aug 31, 2018
D
Democratic21
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
46
Key actions
15
Committee
15
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 6194.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Upper · Passed
Urgency clause adopted.
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 6200.)
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 6189.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 31, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 29, 2018
Lower · Passed
August 29 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Aug 28, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 24, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 24, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 6564.)
lower
Jul 5, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 19, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 11, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 7, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.
lower
May 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4304.) (May 25).
upper
Apr 26, 2018
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4814.) (April 24).
upper
Feb 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
upper
Feb 13, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Co
Ed Chau
DDemocratic
Co
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1121
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1121. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline